S2H Scope Interest

[Rock’N Tacos]

You are clueless. ZeroTech won’t be doing any such thing unless we say so.

Maybe clueless as to your contractual relationship with them, but an expert in business. If you try and handcuff them and don’t allow them to expand market share with an MOA product, they will find a work around.

 

[huntnful]

Finally! A MOA guy that’s reasonable!

Hahaha I’m a “it makes VERY little difference in comparison to 99% of the other things involved in killing something” guy.

 

[Dobermann]

Mil being better doesn’t matter. You have whole generations married to MOA. Nobody is converting for one scope.

You might be surprised ... many of us here have converted to mils for lesser scopes and lesser reticles ...

 

[uglymud]

In for one too start with.

Sent from my SM-S908U using Tapatalk

 

[Coopsdaddy]

I sold my two NXS moa scopes and bought mill scope because of the overwhelming advise on here.Thats a easy decision if you want to get the most out of the knowledgeable guys on this forum,im definitely not one of them but appreciate all the advice they give.
Don’t be so hard headed!

 

[Rock’N Tacos]

Some of you folks need to update your software. S2H didn’t start developing products based on what’s “popular with hunters” or what would sell in huge numbers. Their interest has always been making shit that they wanted, that didn’t exist.
In fact, on a certain level, they also have an interest in changing what is popular amongst hunters and the hunting industry for the benefit of all of us since popular thought is largely based on old myths. And a lot popular stuff doesn’t actually work very well.

This isn’t S2Hs scope - it is ZeroTechs scope. Zero tech will 100% offer this in MOA, or at least use the drop tested design to offer something in MOA that is similar. They 100% care about what’s popular and making money.

 

[glock233]

This isn’t S2Hs scope - it is ZeroTechs scope. Zero tech will 100% offer this in MOA, or at least use the drop tested design to offer something in MOA that is similar. They 100% care about what’s popular and making money.

I don’t know about that. I’m sure there’s an agreement covering the use of the joint product, etc.

 

[Chris in TN]

This isn’t S2Hs scope - it is ZeroTechs scope. Zero tech will 100% offer this in MOA, or at least use the drop tested design to offer something in MOA that is similar. They 100% care about what’s popular and making money.

I generally agree. *edited in light of my next post down*

On a very related note there’s another thread running right now on this site where people complained about a vendor’s product changes. The vendor showed up and is listening and largely setting aside his own views of what might be ‘better’ to listen to his customers about what they want or need or prefer and why they like it. He hasn’t dropped his convictions about improving his product but he has listened and responded and not simply lectured them on why his catfish was better without hot sauce.

Wise vendor, imo.

 

[Chris in TN]

I don’t know about that. I’m sure there’s an agreement covering the use of the joint product, etc.

The last thing I want to do or want to see anyone do is speculate on the inner workings of agreements we aren’t privy to.

I might disagree with the way certain things are being done here, but I will freely consider that market participants have the right to stand on convictions, and make agreements, and all of that good stuff. I will likely continue to argue the stance that consumers should be given choices on this issue, but I am not interested in crafting those arguments in such a way as to attempt to cause a divide between two people that have partnered to make a very important thing happen here. That is not my intent.I hope their partnership is profitable and long. I applaud what’s being done here overall. This is the best news in the world of hunting optics in years, current discussion notwithstanding.