Silver Wings
Lil-Rokslider
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2023
- Messages
- 141
While practicing a couple days ago I was going back and forth between the UM level mounted on the integral rail on a Tikka and the reticle. My perception of plumb and the bubble level were way off. I wrote it off to optical illusion and shot trusting the level, but made a note to check when I got home. This spot only goes to 390 yards so I couldn’t check at distance. I had no misses with about a 6 mph full value wind, so that kind of confirmed my illusion theory…at least in my mind.
Now today in the shop I set the rifle up with the reticle focused on a known vertical line and tried to check the scope for level using the top turret and top of the receiver. I used the UM level and 2 sets of Wheeler levels. One set is cheap plastic and other is less cheap aluminum. I calibrated them using a decent 2’ level I have…meaning I could eyeball compensate for the plastic one’s inaccuracy and adjusted the aluminum one. Only to find they were all over the place when put on the rifle. They were all close one way or the other but no combination of the different levels really corroborated the info from each other.
Which finally brings me to my question…is the top turret on the RS 1.2, in mils, known to be dead nuts to the reticle? At least with this information I can take one of the confounding factors out of my equation full of crappy levels.
If you made it this far I appreciate your attention and input.
Now today in the shop I set the rifle up with the reticle focused on a known vertical line and tried to check the scope for level using the top turret and top of the receiver. I used the UM level and 2 sets of Wheeler levels. One set is cheap plastic and other is less cheap aluminum. I calibrated them using a decent 2’ level I have…meaning I could eyeball compensate for the plastic one’s inaccuracy and adjusted the aluminum one. Only to find they were all over the place when put on the rifle. They were all close one way or the other but no combination of the different levels really corroborated the info from each other.
Which finally brings me to my question…is the top turret on the RS 1.2, in mils, known to be dead nuts to the reticle? At least with this information I can take one of the confounding factors out of my equation full of crappy levels.
If you made it this far I appreciate your attention and input.