RokStok

[deerhunter628]

I read that you had ~3 Leupolds and thought that you were trying to base you're opinion of them based off that? Is that not accurate?

Like i said you obviously did not read what i said. All of my inquires were about Aaron Davidson. I did not say anything good or bad about Leupold. And actually i own 4 Leupolds if you are keeping inventory of my optics.

 

[bielenbm]

Here we go again ^…

 

[RWT]

Send it back to UM and put Attn: Form.

I’ll ship it tomorrow.

 

[AZ_Hunter]

So what’s the latest? Are they taking orders or still getting caught up?

 

[WiscoHoundsman]

They did a drop around mid July but they were non railed versions. Said 90 days from then. Not sure what others are still waiting from. They are not currently taking orders from what I see.

 

[fraz01]

I really like listening to Aaron. He did say some shit in that podcast i completely disagree with though. I dont remember the exact quote but how a flat toe line was harder to get on target. Pretty dumb. Leupold having a lower failure rate that nightforce takes the cake.

My take on the toe line discussion is every design is a trade off. Time to design a stock with an adjustable toe line, maybe!

 

[NSI]

My take on the toe line discussion is every design is a trade off. Time to design a stock with an adjustable toe line, maybe!

The customer/commenter focus for the RS has been on the negative comb, probably because it's the most visible departure from common stock lines.

In shooting the RS back to back with other decent stocks (Grayboe Phoenix, Bastion, modded factory) what actually stands out the most to me in practice is the straight-to-the-rear tracking on the bags. That comes from the flat foreend and the flat toe line.

I don't think folks appreciate a few things enough about that flat toe:

1) How much of your reticle rise in follow-through is actually due to a sloping toe sliding backwards down a bag - not "recoil"

2) How nice it is to be able to make elevation adjustments by squeezing ANYWHERE on the stock your off hand might end up due to positional considerations

3) How much more control you have when YOU get to decide where your off-hand is vs needing to place it where the target elevation matches the slope of the toe

4) How easy (and professionally common) it is to make elevation adjustments by squeezing a rear bag

While I'm still building rifles on Bastions, that's driven by factors other than a belief in any advantage whatsoever of a sloped toe line.

-J

 

[Timjohnson11]

I'd agree with @NSI's comments above and learned the lesson first hand recently... I originally found my Seekins Slam chassis slightly harder to spot impacts when compared to other rifles of the same caliber/weight, specifically my buddies Clymer. I chaulked it up to the fact that it was an inherent downside to chassis systems from a below-bore line approach to the stock. Fast forward to a couple months back and I put together a (very makeshift and homemade) bag rider. The catalyst there was just to improve target acquisition time. However, the unintended outcome was a rifle with less muzzle rise. I no longer notice much of a difference between my Slam and (my buddies) Magnus, solely from minimizing the rifles' ability to slide backwards down my rear bag..

 

[mxgsfmdpx]

Not all guns survive a morning of shooting in 30 mph blowing sand.

 

[NSI]

Not all guns survive a morning of shooting in 30 mph blowing sand.

View attachment 927632

Lisan al gaib!

-J