GSPHUNTER
WKR
- Joined
- Jun 30, 2020
- Messages
- 4,585
OJ had money and no body recieved jack. Kyle has jack and that's all anyone will get.
Last edited:
In Arizona they wouldn't be able to sue Kyle.I think he's going to have the same thing happen as O.J. Not guilty but responsible. He's going to get hammered with wrongful death lawsuits from the dead losers families. I doubt he'll be as fortunate with the next judge as he was with this one. He won't be in jail but he might end up paying these people for the rest of his life. I think this is just wrong. If you are found not guilty it should actually mean something.
Yup. Kyle is “judgement proof”, for now. An 18 year old with nothing but a name.OJ had money and non body. relived jack. Kyle has jack and that's all anyone will get.
I have no idea what you're referring to. Do you have some information to provide that Kyle Rittenhouse beat up a girl? I hope that's not true but if so then please show it to us.That’s a high pedestal for a kid who beat the shit out of a girl. You can agree with the verdict without making him out to be a hero. He isn’t that.
In my opinion the cause of this incident falls squarely on the shoulders of an incompetent governor (just like others across the nation) who wanted to let this city burn to hurt Trump's reelection chances. He could have had police & national guard there to stop it all before the first match was lit. Notice how he had them on standby this time since he's up for reelection soon?On the one hand, I agree that Kyle was defending himself. On the other, I sure as heck don’t want to be “governed” or have to be accountable to folks out there “playing soldier” or “playing cop” and I think I he should’ve stayed home.
This article has a good analysis that I agree with. (Yes, it’s a liberal publication that spews a lot of BS but this analysis is, in my view, spot-on.) I’m not interested in debating, but thought I’d share this article. Folks can read it and make up there own minds.
Kyle Rittenhouse’s Acquittal Does Not Make Him a Hero
The verdict is not a miscarriage of justice—but an acquittal does not make a foolish man a hero.amp.theatlantic.com
I don’t disagree. But I sure ddidnt like to see people “playing soldier” in downtown Boise last summer when there was no violence and the police WERE there. Kyle rittenhouse, and these other people playing soldiers, are no heroes. We should demand freedom from violence, and support those that act in self defense, but at the same time not romanticize or encourage those that walk around with ARs on pretend “patrols”.In my opinion the cause of this incident falls squarely on the shoulders of an incompetent governor (just like others across the nation) who wanted to let this city burn to hurt Trump's reelection chances. He could have had police & national guard there to stop it all before the first match was lit. Notice how he had them on standby this time since he's up for reelection soon?
What are people supposed to to when the government completely abdicates its first priority which is to protect the lives & property of its citizens? Just stand by and let their whole life's work be looted, destroyed, & burned to the ground? F that. Notice also that the politicians and "elites" who condone this shit have heavily armed security and fences to protect their family & their property. Send all the goons over to their houses next
Could not disagree more, but we may not be talking about the same thing. If the State loses control or refuses to enforce Rule of Law, we the people have the right and obligation to do so.I don’t disagree. But I sure ddidnt like to see people “playing soldier” in downtown Boise last summer when there was no violence and the police WERE there. Kyle rittenhouse, and these other people playing soldiers, are no heroes. We should demand freedom from violence, and support those that act in self defense, but at the same time not romanticize or encourage those that walk around with ARs on pretend “patrols”.
Politicians tied the hands of the police. Even then, sometimes theres only so much police can do to protect people (first) and property (second). There are numerous court cases that have been upheld that prove police are not obligated to protect you - they will try their best, but they literally cannot be everywhere at once. Your safety and livelihood are YOUR responsibility. Liberal politicians literally want to remove police AND your right to defend yourself - leaving you helpless?? Not a chance.
Kyle did what all of us need to do. He did it with far less knowledge and gear than we all have access to. A boy doing a man’s job. We let this happen by burying our heads in the sand as some panty wearing politician or news clown dictates what is right or wrong. What a riot is or what is peaceful. What is murder or what is self defense.
The people have spoken. The shots were heard. If only the lesson was learned…
I don’t disagree. But I sure ddidnt like to see people “playing soldier” in downtown Boise last summer when there was no violence and the police WERE there. Kyle rittenhouse, and these other people playing soldiers, are no heroes. We should demand freedom from violence, and support those that act in self defense, but at the same time not romanticize or encourage those that walk around with ARs on pretend “patrols”.
Respectfully... I don't think Kyle was "pretending" anything while he was being beaten over the head with a skateboard, kicked in the face or staring down the barrel of a pistol while people were screaming "kill him". Again, none of this shit would've ever happened if the liberals didn't "romanticize & encourage" looting, anarchy, violence & destruction, all based on a mountain of lies. Why is this so hard to understand?We should demand freedom from violence, and support those that act in self defense, but at the same time not romanticize or encourage those that walk around with ARs on pretend “patrols”.
Question...a mob shows up in a neighborhood with the intent of burning it down & destroying property. Do you think they are more or less likely to do it if they're met by a "patrol" of citizens armed to the teeth?
Pretty weak analogy . A one on one bar fight verses thousands of useful idiot domestic terrorists destroying US cities? Billions of dollars in damages last year, thousands lost their hard earned businesses, homes, hundreds of police attacked, dozens dead.We'll never know his motives, and it doesn't matter in this context. But I'd give even odds that his motives were to become an armed combatant in an already chaotic situation.
Can I listen to a police scanner and wait for the weekly fight to break out in the street in front of the local bars and then head down with an AR? Of course I can, but should I?
Last year Spokane was looted and the the domestic terrorists advised they were coming to CDA to burn down the city. Citizens showed up and nothing happened. The local sheriff supported them. Of course the biased left wing media labeled them white supremacists as they always do for protecting your communityI don’t disagree. But I sure ddidnt like to see people “playing soldier” in downtown Boise last summer when there was no violence and the police WERE there. Kyle rittenhouse, and these other people playing soldiers, are no heroes. We should demand freedom from violence, and support those that act in self defense, but at the same time not romanticize or encourage those that walk around with ARs on pretend “patrols”.
Boise is a really diverse area. Just like Utah lolRespectfully... I don't think Kyle was "pretending" anything while he was being beaten over the head with a skateboard, kicked in the face or staring down the barrel of a pistol while people were screaming "kill him". Again, none of this shit would've ever happened if the liberals didn't "romanticize & encourage" looting, anarchy, violence & destruction, all based on a mountain of lies. Why is this so hard to understand?
Question...a mob shows up in a neighborhood with the intent of burning it down & destroying property. Do you think they are more or less likely to do it if they're met by a "patrol" of citizens armed to the teeth?
Thick irony in this post. As someone who lives in a somewhat diverse area (62% white, 30% black, 6% Hispanic), the only relavent metric in your statement is "high violent crime." And the solution to that is focused law enforcement,. Not speculation, documented fact.Boise is a really diverse area. Just like Utah lol
Its funny when you live in safe low crime non diverse western states to go on and lecture others who live in high violent crime areas on crime violence and self protection.