Rings!

[bnewt3]

What is the current fair-haired child when it comes to rings? Ive got a 110 Tactical with a 20MOA Pic rail coming and a Bushnell Match Pro to go on it. Im not looking for cheap as can be and im not looking to spend as much as the scope.

 

[bnewt3]

Vortex Pro? not a bad price and well-reviewed as far as I can tell

 

[blkqi]

Depends on application to an extent, but all my riflescopes get American Rifle Company rings or mount. They are fantastic.

 

[IdahoBeav]

Nightforce X-treme Duty

 

[hereinaz]

Basically, any "precision" rings will do you. I don't know what the current "cool rings" are. It seems like there haven't been any new fads that I have become aware of.

I do like the ARC rings, they are easy to get the scope level. Drop them in and one bolt.

 

[ljalberta]

NF Ultralites unless you need something extra low. I’m tempted to try the UM Premier rings for the built in level, but haven’t personally done so.

 

[thinhorn_AK]

Nightforce ultra or warne mountain tech. Hawkins look nice too.

 

[JohnJohnson]

Another vote for the ARC rings just because they're easier to get your scope installed/level compared to all other rings. Having said that, any quality ring will work.

 

[bnewt3]

I like how those ARC rings work but I cant bring myself to spend $180 when with a bit of time a different ring will do the same thing.

 

[Shortschaf]

Seekins / Vortex PMR's are my $100 go-to (used market)
Mainly because they list their mfg tolerance to be ±0.0005" which is exceptional (if true). And now after owning several sets, they just keep working.

If they were as cheap/easy to find anything by NF or Hawkins would equally as trustworth in my opinion

 

[swampfox]

I have the Zeiss precision rings and don’t have any complaints. They seem to do the job.

 

[ArcherAnthony]

I use Leupold backcountry rings on all my rifles. Never had a issue

 

[redneckbmxer24]

NF UL, Leupold MK4, Badger, Seekins, ARC, APA, Hawkins, Spuhr… there’s a lot of excellent choices when it comes to rings.