Elite
WKR
- Joined
- Sep 4, 2018
- Messages
- 1,084
Leica amplus 6
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I like the idea of fundraising for this endeavor but what do gel tests have to do with scope testing/ am I missing some correlation? Are you wanting Form to throw the scopes at gel? or do ballistics gel testing like everyone on youtube already does? Not ragging, just curious
Gel testing the correct way hasn’t been done because of the expense. Not to mention most people don’t know what they are looking at to begin with.Tis the the season for giving how about everyone that has benefited from this, give $20 to help fund future projects (maybe some gel tests). Looking forward to more.
Screw the gel tests, continue the elk tests.Gel testing the correct way hasn’t been done because of the expense. Not to mention most people don’t know what they are looking at to begin with.
Yeah I get that just didn’t see the correlation to raising money for scope testing. I also think there are minimal gains to testing bullets “properly” compared to the potential gain in industry changes testing scopes.Gel testing the correct way hasn’t been done because of the expense. Not to mention most people don’t know what they are looking at to begin with.
There is no correlation to speak of I just want to see both.Yeah I get that just didn’t see the correlation to raising money for scope testing. I also think there are minimal gains to testing bullets “properly” compared to the potential gain in industry changes testing scopes.
ill tell you right now the kalhes will fail the 18" drop.Khales k318 or k525.
I seem to recall following a great thread on another forum from Alex Wheeler with frozen scopes checking scope zero retentions/ wandering zero and the Khales scopes performing at the top. Sadly no longer able to find it, likely removed because it hurt too many scope manufactures feelings.
No Huskemaw has been eval’d. If you want to have it done on that 1-6x, contact @Ryan Avery and he will work it out.
@Formidilosus what was the consensus on the Huskemaw evaluation? I couldn’t find it in the testing sub forum.
I know Ryan and others opinion is the glass is poor in less than perfect conditions but they tend to track and return to zero well. That was all pre drop testing sub forum though.
@Formidilosus is there still plans to test Ryan’s rs3.2?
Ok sounds good. I knew he had it on the 6um and I swear I read somewhere him saying he had taken it off and put the trijicon on so he could send it to you for testing. Obviously things changed. Thanks.Not up to me, you’ll have to ask him.
Ok sounds good. I knew he had it on the 6um and I swear I read somewhere him saying he had taken it off and put the trijicon on so he could send it to you for testing. Obviously things changed. Thanks.
I see. Thanks for the insightHe changed it because it developed problems. I’m not sure what happened after that.