Rifle scopes you'd love to see Form test

[Dobermann]

Minox ZP5 3-18x50

FWIW, that one's not much lighter than it's bigger brother, and it doesn't come with the THLR reticle.

 

[PredatorSlayer]

Has anybody drop tested the Burris XTR III?

 

[lhbackcountry]

HA, looked at S2HU with Form and Co. Found this thread then 46 pages, countless links, and 5 hours later we made it to the end. Following for some valuable info and free entertainment.

 

[bigunit]

I'd really like to see run of the mill budget scopes like the bushnell 4500 and burris fullfield evaluated. They seem to be good basic scopes if you're a set it and forget it type of user. I figure the fullfield with the simple ballistic reticle would be a great scope for kids to learn to shoot with without messing with dials.

 

[yeti12]

I'd like to suggest drop testing of the new kahles 328i. The FOV is nuts and weight isn't bad for using it as a hunting scope.

 

[madcalfe]

I'd like to suggest drop testing of the new kahles 328i. The FOV is nuts and weight isn't bad for using it as a hunting scope.

kahles will be toast on the first drop.
i have went through 2 K318i's in 2 years.

 

[Dobermann]

I guess it's not a riflescope, but I'd love to hear more about what @Ryan Avery said on the S2H podcast about @Formidilosus's opinion of the new Nightforce spotter ... that has me intrigued.

 

[JCMCUBIC]

I'm curious about the reliability of the Maven RS.2 2-10x38, mainly in regard to maintaining zero. It's not in what I consider the "long range" category because of the reticle and lack of elevation dial, but along the same lines as the SWFA 2.5-10x32, a lightweight set and forget. On some rifles, set and forget is all I need...if the zero doesn't wander.

RS.2 - 2-10x38 SFP

Buy Maven Outdoor Equipment Company RS.2 Riflescopes. Our RS Series Riflescopes stack up with the most celebrated and expensive scopes in the world…bar none.

mavenbuilt.com

 

[diverc18]

With the success of the new Maven RS1.2, I would love to see the RS3.2 tested. Hopefully it would be made to the same standards as the RS1.2

 

[rackcity24]

@Ryan Avery did you guys get a scope from apex optics? If so which were you planning on trying out?

Sent from my SM-S901U using Tapatalk

 

[fishsticks]

I haven’t read all 46 pages but the one brand I haven’t seen mentioned at all in the various threads (but may have missed it) is Sig. is that because they’ve been found lacking already or just that no one’s brought them up? Seems like some of their line might fit the bill in terms of ffp and reticle and weight.

 

[NSI]

I haven’t read all 46 pages but the one brand I haven’t seen mentioned at all in the various threads (but may have missed it) is Sig. is that because they’ve been found lacking already or just that no one’s brought them up? Seems like some of their line might fit the bill in terms of ffp and reticle and weight.

I’ve got a sierra6 BDX I’d lend to the cause.

-J

 

[mj23polaris]

@Ryan Avery did you guys get a scope from apex optics? If so which were you planning on trying out?

Sent from my SM-S901U using Tapatalk

I think he mentioned it on the shoot 2 hunt podcast that he got one.

Sent from my motorola edge 5G UW (2021) using Tapatalk

 

[mtwarden]

I'm curious about the reliability of the Maven RS.2 2-10x38, mainly in regard to maintaining zero. It's not in what I consider the "long range" category because of the reticle and lack of elevation dial, but along the same lines as the SWFA 2.5-10x32, a lightweight set and forget. On some rifles, set and forget is all I need...if the zero doesn't wander.

RS.2 - 2-10x38 SFP

Buy Maven Outdoor Equipment Company RS.2 Riflescopes. Our RS Series Riflescopes stack up with the most celebrated and expensive scopes in the world…bar none.

mavenbuilt.com

I somehow missed this scope when searching for a lightweight scope; I’d also be interested on how it fares

 

[REM700WIN]

Vudu 5-25
Steiner T6Xi 2.5-15

Has there been drop evals on any Vudu's or Steiner's?

 

[BRTreedogs]

Clearly you're not. If you were, we wouldn't be having this convo.

Here is the deal, you think you are rite and I am wrong.
But I think I'm rite and you are an old boomer who thihe is better then other people and its your job to teach them rite from wrong.

How about your research involves doing the shit yourself instead of sucking off the teets of others to do it for you.

Form even says his sample size is small do it yourself.

 

[djewell87]

Credo

 

[FullyTorqued]

Form advocates for wide FOV scopes. I’d like to see the Primary Arms FFP Compact PLxC 1-8×24 drop tested. Seems to get good reviews on the tactical side, maybe it’s good for hunting too?

 

[Cannonball]

My god talking to you is unproductive. Why are you even here? If you have such a low opinion of exchanging knowledge, what are you doing on internet forums in the first place?

Also, based on your pic, I'm pretty sure you're old enough to be *my* dad, old man. Maybe you mistook epistemic competence for age.

You two get a room, or a cage, whatever just stop mucking up the thread with your bromance

 

[Mjolnir]

Far be it for me to insert some basic STEM knowledge into a tech forum. For free. I guess I'll just go back to getting paid for my expertise. Curiously, I've never had to explain what is and isn't research, nor basic manners to a paying client, and a paying client has never banned me from speaking. Deuces.