Restocked SWFA 3-9x42 Gen 1

Apologies in advance for what may be a stupid question, but what's the best way to measure the total turret travel on my 3x9? I assume using the top / inside measurement jaws on calipers, taking the difference between the turret all the way down and all the way up? Or is there a more elegant way I'm not thinking of?
 
Apologies in advance for what may be a stupid question, but what's the best way to measure the total turret travel on my 3x9? I assume using the top / inside measurement jaws on calipers, taking the difference between the turret all the way down and all the way up? Or is there a more elegant way I'm not thinking of?
On mine I bottomed the turret out, took off the cap and measured the distance between the rim and the brass plate of the erector assemble below. Then I put the turret on (without the screw) at zero and cranked it all the way out and got 25.2mils of movement. I them again measured down to the brass plate and got ~3.14mm difference.

I printed out a test set of shims, and the couple I tried the thickness seems dialed in, on my scope at least. I do want to put some clearance back in on the ID and OD though, they fit really snug which doesn't facilitate changing as easily.

The tabs are nice for keeping it all together but annoying to trim (at least with the current snug dimensions) and I feel like loose pieces would be nicer.
1746240812826.jpeg
 
Measuring the difference in the brass plate on my 3-9 x 42 this way, I get 3.2 mm of travel. But i am measuring 27.5 mils of travel on the turret. If you make a set of shims for the 3x9 I'd be interested.
 
Or rather if you start selling these kits, I'm interested
I can print these for folks if desired, need to stop at think about a cost basis though, is there concern about potential variation versus my scope or not really worried since the measurements have relative reference points and will get ya in the ballpark? IE if you put in a -10mil base and 22mils of shims and it dials 2mils past zero then add in 24mils of shims instead. Even if that was 23mils from zero on your scope but it was 24mils on mine. Once you're in the ballpark you're just making minor adjustments. Not sure how much to over think it, haha.
 
I'd be shocked if there's variation. All the parts have to be interchangeable off whatever process is used for that part.
I wouldn't have thought so either so I went back and looked again and realized my error in the numbers I was typing earlier, I got 3.14mm in 27mils (not 25.2mils, damn decimal place... ;) ) which if Alpha echo got 27.5mils in 3.2mm that ties off.
 
Back
Top