Refining my elk application strategy

Joined
Mar 16, 2025
I've been getting serious about elk hunting over the last few years and am looking to refine my application strategy.

Current Setup:
  • I am a Colorado resident.
  • In Colorado, I get a 0-point draw A-list archery tag, where I’m into bugling bulls almost daily.
  • I usually pick up a B-list rifle tag (secondary/leftover) or a B-list archery tag for a meat cow hunt.
  • I also help a friend during 1st or 4th rifle.
  • For the last few years, I hunted a ranch in Unit 36 in New Mexico through a family connection, but that place got sold.
I've put in a lot of time the last few years and am feeling excited by the thought of having a little more skin in the game with application cost and the potential for expensive non-resident tags in an area I don't know. What other states should I be prioritizing applying in and building points in? Which ones have the best bang for your buck in terms of solid archery hunts during the rut? I probably can't justify the cost of applying for every state so right now the shortlist is Arizona, Wyoming, Idaho and Montana. I used to live in Montana and like the idea of being able to hunt a general tag every 2 or 3 years and already have good spots there. Other than that, I think I would like to continue hunting Colorado twice a year and then focus on drawing solid units in other states whenever possible. I am very open to other ideas and strategies so would love some feedback
 
Given your situation and ability to Elk Hunt every year, I would say definitely yes to Montana and Wyoming. You could do the preference point game in Montana and be able to hunt probably every third year. Whether you want to play the $25 per year bonus point game is up to you. If you do that, you can always have your name in the hat for a limited entry tag on the years you draw your general tag. For the archery hunter there are some easier to draw limited entry hunts compared to rifle opportunities in Montana.

For Wyoming, you can buy your points, but would advise putting in every year, and on the years you know you do not have enough points to draw a general tag you could aim high For units that have at least one random tag, and always have your hat in the ring for a great tag, but then be able to general tag hunt once every few years (assuming you are willing to pay for the special tag).

As far as other states go You probably would have to choose between New Mexico or Idaho as far as random states. The investment in Idaho every year is a little bit higher just because the nonrefundable license price is higher. You could always play the game in December and try to get a tag, but for someone trying to hunt the same area year after year Idaho is very unpredictable. The draw odds for non-residence for top controlled hunt tags are pretty bad, similar to New Mexico, which is a cheaper state to apply to year over a year. It would be reasonable to choose either one, both, or neither of these.

I would not do Utah, Oregon, Nevada, Washington, or the Dakotas given your situation.

Arizona is worth a look given that you can buy/build points, and you always have a chance at a tag. Archery options are more open in Arizona than the rifle only Hunter.
 
Cool thanks for the detailed response. I should also mention that I’ve thought about just applying for points as my first choice in Colorado then either hunting a reliable 2nd choice, secondary draw, leftover license or OTC for the foreseeable future but it feels silly to leave an area that I can consistently draw and know how to hunt well already. It is tempting though to have Colorado elk points with the 2028 changes since I would have a chance to draw some of the “once in lifetime” archery elk hunts from the 50% random allocation without needing 20 points.
 
Back
Top