Recently missed a caribou on a hunt of a lifetime. What caused the miss?

The Guide

WKR
Joined
Aug 20, 2023
Messages
576
Location
Montana
Heading out now, Got delayed yesterday


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Not now. Did you verify your zero upon landing in camp and before you went on your hunt? Always verify an in the field zero after flying! Lots of forces are placed on mechanical equipment during takeoff and landing.

Jay
 

rickyw

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
Jan 6, 2024
Messages
111
Location
Alaska
I didn’t read every response here, but how was the wind? Could the thermals have pushed the bullet closer to the mountainside and therefore under the belly?
 

Wrench

WKR
Joined
Aug 23, 2018
Messages
6,046
Location
WA
I just ran the numbers on my 260ai which is very close to what you are shooting. 32* drops me to 4moa at 400yds.

That puts 12" of daylight on your reticle.....

Food for thought.
 

Wiscgunner

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
Jun 24, 2018
Messages
223
Location
Madison, WI
I’m curious why you think my ballistics were not tested and verified?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
No ill intent meant, simply assumption because you haven’t given us much data to go on.

What was you mv with that rifle/ammo?
What was your predicted holds for wind?
How much wind was there?
What direction was the wind?
Was there an up draft or down draft?
Was the rifle completely dry?
Was it raining?
Had it rained?
What solver are you using?
Scope height input?


Such a limited amount of info in the original post asks the readers to simply guess and assume But if you really want help identifying the problem a better description of your scenario would allow readers to attempt to replicate you situation. This would help eliminate data setup. Retesting the rifle after to check zero would help identify equipment issues as well as disassembling the rifle from the stock to see if you have collected junk in the barrel channel. Info about your scope mounting procedure such as torque specs, rings used, witness marks, etc would also help diagnose your issue.
 

Laramie

WKR
Joined
Apr 17, 2020
Messages
2,626
These threads...smh. To the op, did you really expect to find an answer here that wasn't critical? Why not answer the questions from the guys trying to help you find the answer? My gut tells me Mallards was likely correct.
 

The Guide

WKR
Joined
Aug 20, 2023
Messages
576
Location
Montana
These threads...smh. To the op, did you really expect to find an answer here that wasn't critical? Why not answer the questions from the guys trying to help you find the answer? My gut tells me Mallards was likely correct.
To get 7.4 MOA come up at 410 yards with a 32⁰ look angle, I had to take the 140 ELDM down to 2465 FPS. I think an input is wrong in his calculations. If you assume a 110 fps loss from a 20" barrel and box velocity being overstated, the same drop at 32⁰ and 410 yards is 6.5 MOA. If you say he has a fast barrel and a lot of fast ammo that gives actual box velocity of 2710 you get a 5.9 MOA drop at 410 yards. All signs point to him having shot over with his calculations, not under. My assumptions are scope didn't hold zero and zero wasn't verified in camp before hunting, range finder gave a bad range, or something in the shot process is causing error at that distance.

Jay
 
OP
Elite

Elite

WKR
Joined
Sep 4, 2018
Messages
1,062
Not now. Did you verify your zero upon landing in camp and before you went on your hunt? Always verify an in the field zero after flying! Lots of forces are placed on mechanical equipment during takeoff and landing.

Jay

Yes I did then also.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

atmat

WKR
Joined
Jun 10, 2022
Messages
3,047
Location
Colorado
I’m betting against the Leica, personally.

Sorry to hear this OP. Major bummer but you’ll bounce back!
 
OP
Elite

Elite

WKR
Joined
Sep 4, 2018
Messages
1,062
Checked zero and it was good at 100 yards. Unable to take a long shot due to the range I was at.

So with the range finder not in line of sight mode and it using rifle mode which takes the angle into effect and spits out the correct yardage for the shot. I still got 7.4 moa on my dope card.

MV is 2615 fps and factory 140eldm

There was hardly any wind at the moment so I did not hold for it


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

mtnbound

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
Nov 8, 2016
Messages
188
Location
N. Idaho
Checked zero and it was good at 100 yards. Unable to take a long shot due to the range I was at.

So with the range finder not in line of sight mode and it using rifle mode which takes the angle into effect and spits out the correct yardage for the shot. I still got 7.4 moa on my dope card.

MV is 2615 fps and factory 140eldm

There was hardly any wind at the moment so I did not hold for it


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Not knowing all of the environmental details but using your MV and bullet. I get 4.9-5.7MOA.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:

eric1115

WKR
Joined
Jun 26, 2018
Messages
740
Your shoot-to was 410? That means your LOS distance was around 580 yards if the angle was 32° by my calculations (ballistic, not trigonometric) to get the same elevation correction in my calculator.

Trig function puts the LOS at ~485 to get a horizontal distance of 410.

That's a pretty big discrepancy between EHR and a LOS/angle solution.

Regardless, a high angle, 500 - 600 yard shot is no chip shot by my estimation. You should stop thinking of it as a 400 yard shot.
 
Last edited:

ljalberta

WKR
Joined
Dec 7, 2015
Messages
1,599
Based on some quick test runs with only partial information. 4DOF and Shooter are giving me different come ups. Closer to 7 moa with shooter and closer to 4.5 moa with 4DOF (garbage in, garbage out). In my experience, if something was incorrectly entered, you can get some wacky results from some of the calculators.

I didn’t complete all the info and I don’t know the details of your particular shot.

I would guess either shoot error or calculator error if the scope has retained zero and accurately tracks.

I should note that this is based on the distance being an actual 410 yards. And 410 not being the angle-compensated distance that your rangefinder provided.
 
Top