Questioning the "gold Standard Drop Test" and the conclusions of "This scope brand does/doesn't hold zero"


Need I say more?
 
i do not know about drop tests per say but the days were i had a leupold scope on a rifle going in the sled and banged on trails while bison hunting are long gone.
i destroyed all the kind and always thought it was the mounts or the rings or what else then some scopes came back from oregon or alberta without being fixed but still not able to hold zero. i sold them at cost or loss and now im using the old elite bushnell made in japan by low and lrts and so far so good but again my experiences so valuable only for me ...
 
I am gonna change direction a bit but i was just listening to episode 99 of S2H podcast and realized something when they were discussing the drop test.

Ryan said that the drop test and ride around test were separate but scopes that fail the drops also fail the ride around and vice versa. I would be interested in knowing how many of those scopes would have passed the ride around test before the drops. How is it determined that the drops didn’t damage the internals to where it cant pass the ride around test. @Wiscgunner kind of hit on this with the multi level ranking but i think doing a ride around test before the drops is the only way to get those rankings. Otherwise a scope that would be considered “deer blind appropriate” might not pass to that point due to internal failures from the large drops.

If that did not make sense i apologize but my mind to mouth translation is a little off sometimes.
 
Back
Top