Q&A Sightron S-Tac 1-6x24mm Field Eval

Formidilosus

Super Moderator
Shoot2HuntU
Joined
Oct 22, 2014
Messages
10,331
See-

 
Last edited:

RWT

WKR
Joined
Jul 4, 2022
Messages
358
I see you have it listed as the 1x4. However, the images of the box show it to be a 1x6. Curious as I believe the 1x6 STAC is on sale.

 

BjornF16

WKR
Joined
Dec 12, 2019
Messages
2,661
Location
Texas
I see you have it listed as the 1x4. However, the images of the box show it to be a 1x6. Curious as I believe the 1x6 STAC is on sale.

His target shows it to be 1-6x24
 

5811

WKR
Joined
Jan 25, 2023
Messages
620
The second Sightron LPVO to perform reasonably well in the initial tests. Might be a trend.

Interesting that this one is made in the Philippines.
 

RWT

WKR
Joined
Jul 4, 2022
Messages
358
I assume the update demonstrates it held zero? Asking as this is on the list and it is between this model and a used SWFA 1x6 a buddy is letting go.
 

rickyw

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
Jan 6, 2024
Messages
131
Location
Alaska
@Formidilosus On the stac and S6 1-6 scopes, you torqued the rings up to and over 25 inch pounds. Is that okay only for these particular models? If so, why?
 
OP
Formidilosus

Formidilosus

Super Moderator
Shoot2HuntU
Joined
Oct 22, 2014
Messages
10,331
@Formidilosus On the stac and S6 1-6 scopes, you torqued the rings up to and over 25 inch pounds. Is that okay only for these particular models? If so, why?

It’s not that it’s “ok” or “not ok”- it’s that 18in-lbs let the scope lose zero. Are for tightening them to 25in-lbs, that just experience. 20in-lbs generally/sometimes works with these rings, but I didn’t want to have a “maybe”. I wanted to go to straight to the answer.


Having said all that, with the rings used- 25in-lbs is the correct torque, and good scopes have no issues with it.
 

gbflyer

WKR
Joined
Feb 20, 2017
Messages
1,766
I bought one of these and received it today. I have it mounted on a light carbine AR. I have to say that I am impressed with it. Robust to say the least, and I like the reticle for the dark woods.
 

ianpadron

WKR
Joined
Feb 3, 2016
Messages
1,999
Location
Montana
@Formidilosus how's it do in low light? Understand LPVOs are limited there but the true 1x on a gun that goes from clear-cut to dark timber in the same day would be sweet up here in NW MT
 
Last edited:
OP
Formidilosus

Formidilosus

Super Moderator
Shoot2HuntU
Joined
Oct 22, 2014
Messages
10,331
@Formidilosus how's it do in low light? Understand LPVOs are limited there but the true 1x on a gun thar goes from clear-cut to dark timber in the same day would be sweet up here in NW MT

I didn’t notice anything bad. It isn’t Alpha glass, but is perfectly functional from what I saw.

BUT all LPVO’s suffer in low light compared to normal scopes.
 

Choupique

WKR
Joined
Oct 2, 2022
Messages
650
BUT all LPVO’s suffer in low light compared to normal scopes.

I'm thinking I might pop my lpvo cherry with this one. I assume you mean perfectly functional as in it'll get you to shooting time as well as can be expected? At least gen 1 SWFA 3-15 decent?

I think this would be cool for my .375
 
OP
Formidilosus

Formidilosus

Super Moderator
Shoot2HuntU
Joined
Oct 22, 2014
Messages
10,331
I'm thinking I might pop my lpvo cherry with this one. I assume you mean perfectly functional as in it'll get you to shooting time as well as can be expected? At least gen 1 SWFA 3-15 decent?

No, it probably won’t perform in really low light as the 3-15x SWFA.


I think this would be cool for my .375

It would be interesting to see how it does with that recoil.
 

Choupique

WKR
Joined
Oct 2, 2022
Messages
650
Unfortunately my only way to make the rifle useful is a good short range scope with good light transmission for guarding feeders in thick stuff. It won't get used for any real hunting so I have a hard time spending trijicon money on it.

They also make a 1.75-5x32 that's cheap, might give that one a go instead.

Thanks for all the time and effort put into studies. Saves folk like me a pile of money.
 
Top