Q&A Crimson Trace Hardline Pro 4-16x50mm FFP Field Eval

[Formidilosus]

See-

Thread 'Crimson Trace Hardline Pro 4-16x40mm FFP Field Eval'

Yesterday at 10:30 AM

This is a field evaluation of the Crimson Trace Hardline Pro 4-16x40mm FFP scope. This scope was sent to Ryan Avery for an evaluation.


The scope:



Turrets:

Revolution indicated, .1 mil per click, 10 mils per rev with a zero stop for elevation. Windage does not have a revolution stop.





Reticle: Standard mil based overall. Center dot with .2 mil increments on the windage, and .5 mils on the vertical. 9 mils each side from center until the bold outer posts.


4x



16x-



Drop Evaluation RTZ and...

• Formidilosus
• Replies: 0
• Forum: Rifle Scope Field Evaluations

• 

 

[Mountainrancher]

Wonder why this scope did poorly when the sfp did much better? Is it a different internal design or was the sfp more of a fluke?

 

[Formidilosus]

Wonder why this scope did poorly when the sfp did much better? Is it a different internal design or was the sfp more of a fluke?

SFP and FFP are very different designs.

 

[RockAndSage]

SFP and FFP are very different designs.

Do you see any trends in durability/reliability differences between SFP and FFP?

 

[Formidilosus]

Do you see any trends in durability/reliability differences between SFP and FFP?

Ehh. Not really. Technically from what I understand, SFP is easier/simpler to make more durable. But, in real world results, either the company makes a scope to be durable or they don’t.

 

[Blake C]

Did you do a tall target test?

 

[Formidilosus]

Did you do a tall target test?

 

[5811]

This is disappointing. Too good of a deal to be true, I suppose.

Thanks for doing the evaluation.