Q&A Sightron S-Tac 1-6x24mm Field Eval

Formidilosus

Super Moderator
Shoot2HuntU
Joined
Oct 22, 2014
Messages
10,069
See-

 
Last edited:

RWT

WKR
Joined
Jul 4, 2022
Messages
337
I see you have it listed as the 1x4. However, the images of the box show it to be a 1x6. Curious as I believe the 1x6 STAC is on sale.

 

BjornF16

WKR
Joined
Dec 12, 2019
Messages
2,622
Location
Texas
I see you have it listed as the 1x4. However, the images of the box show it to be a 1x6. Curious as I believe the 1x6 STAC is on sale.

His target shows it to be 1-6x24
 

5811

WKR
Joined
Jan 25, 2023
Messages
591
The second Sightron LPVO to perform reasonably well in the initial tests. Might be a trend.

Interesting that this one is made in the Philippines.
 

RWT

WKR
Joined
Jul 4, 2022
Messages
337
I assume the update demonstrates it held zero? Asking as this is on the list and it is between this model and a used SWFA 1x6 a buddy is letting go.
 
OP
Formidilosus

Formidilosus

Super Moderator
Shoot2HuntU
Joined
Oct 22, 2014
Messages
10,069
@Formidilosus On the stac and S6 1-6 scopes, you torqued the rings up to and over 25 inch pounds. Is that okay only for these particular models? If so, why?

It’s not that it’s “ok” or “not ok”- it’s that 18in-lbs let the scope lose zero. Are for tightening them to 25in-lbs, that just experience. 20in-lbs generally/sometimes works with these rings, but I didn’t want to have a “maybe”. I wanted to go to straight to the answer.


Having said all that, with the rings used- 25in-lbs is the correct torque, and good scopes have no issues with it.
 

gbflyer

WKR
Joined
Feb 20, 2017
Messages
1,728
I bought one of these and received it today. I have it mounted on a light carbine AR. I have to say that I am impressed with it. Robust to say the least, and I like the reticle for the dark woods.
 
Top