Q&A on NF NX6 scope reviews

[Formidilosus]

This is slightly off-topic but it doesn't deserve its own thread and I'd rather put it here than other threads:

In light of the S2H scope release, does the OP intend to continue drop testing other scopes from other makers, and is there a methodology as to how he's choosing which scopes to test next?

(*cough* Burris veracity genII 2.5-12, *cough*)

This has been answered, but you need to tag me if you want me to see it.

Yes, the scope evals will continue- why wouldn’t they? And the choice of what gets evaled is the same, however Ryan and I are being a bit more selective to scopes that are compelling or that we want to see, as the time/effort has gotten out of hand with random scopes that aren’t really useful.

 

[Chris in TN]

This has been answered, but you need to tag me if you want me to see it.

Yes, the scope evals will continue- why wouldn’t they? And the choice of what gets evaled is the same, however Ryan and I are being a bit more selective to scopes that are compelling or that we want to see, as the time/effort has gotten out of hand with random scopes that aren’t really useful.

Thanks. I tagged you in the other thread so you could consider whether the scope I'm referring to (burris veracity gen II 2.5-12) is worth bothering with. Again, thank you.

 

[tipsntails7]

Why doesn’t Nightforce just make a version of the MOAR reticle in Mil?

It’s easy to see for the most part, it’s less cluttered, but still would have plenty of info. Seems like an easy solution.

 

[Mike D Texas]

Thanks. I tagged you in the other thread so you could consider whether the scope I'm referring to (burris veracity gen II 2.5-12) is worth bothering with. Again, thank you.

I looked through one of these at SCI Dallas. The reticle seems to be very usable.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro

 

[Mike D Texas]

Why doesn’t Nightforce just make a version of the MOAR reticle in Mil?

It’s easy to see for the most part, it’s less cluttered, but still would have plenty of info. Seems like an easy solution.

They do, it’s the MIL-R aaannnnddd they are discontinuing it. This is currently the only MIL reticle that’s truly useable and not stupidly cluttered with .2 MIL hash marks which is not needed in a hunting reticle.

 

[SDHNTR]

They do, it’s the MIL-R aaannnnddd they are discontinuing it. This is currently the only MIL reticle that’s truly useable and not stupidly cluttered with .2 MIL hash marks which is not needed in a hunting reticle.

Usable yes, but still not visible at low power.

 

[Undrgrndprdcts]

Really all they need is thick solid stadia lines that come in far enough from all directions on a Mil-C. That would be perfect. Everything you need and nothing you don't.