Q&A on NF NX6 scope reviews

Why would they give you scopes to evaluate without the correct guts?
Here’s some scopes but don’t test them because they will be different later 🤷🏻‍♂️

Because they don’t have production scopes yet. This was a “it will look and feel like this”.
 
I know there are multiple threads, however they are so large and jumbled that actual details are lost.


See this-
I would even say those are usable reticles for "our" purpose/needs...
 
I’m biased toward a reticle that will actually function well for hunting. And these are just terrible…idk if they’re designed to be optimal for a different market, and the brains at NF think they’re “good enough” for hunting, or if there is a willful blindness and some sort of stubborn pushback to the market demand voiced on Rokslide, but either way these are really bad imo.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Terrible is a strong word. Not great, but even the Mil C is not terrible and this FC appears to be a marked improvement from that. I still strongly prefer fhe RS1.2 reticle overall but this, especially with the illuminated ring will serve well at close range/low power compared to any other reticles NF has put out to date.
 
@Formidilosus
How do you see these different scopes playing out compared to what’s on the market?

They are what the NX8 should have been. What I don’t see is how the NX8 continues unless the NX6’s don’t have the durability or reliability- which I doubt will be the case.


I know you have extensive experience in multiple shooting disciplines outside of hunting. Do you see any of these unseating the current recommended first choice optics in other shooting niches?

Unseating? I don’t know. But the 5-30x is a much better gaming scope that than the 4-32x NX8. I think you’ll see a bunch of these on competition rifles.
 
Terrible is a strong word. Not great, but even the Mil C is not terrible and this FC appears to be a marked improvement from that. I still strongly prefer fhe RS1.2 reticle overall but this, especially with the illuminated ring will serve well at close range/low power compared to any other reticles NF has put out to date.

It’s a Mil-C with a donut. On 2x it isn’t functionally any better. 20 mils between thick outer posts is too large to bracket- there isn’t a top or bottom to help box it in.
 
Terrible is a strong word. Not great, but even the Mil C is not terrible and this FC appears to be a marked improvement from that. I still strongly prefer fhe RS1.2 reticle overall but this, especially with the illuminated ring will serve well at close range/low power compared to any other reticles NF has put out to date.

Bad enough that it takes it off the table for many users is “terrible” in my book. Especially considering the literal years of hunter feedback NF has been given at this point.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Bad enough that it takes it off the table for many users is “terrible” in my book. Especially considering the literal years of hunter feedback NF has been given at this point.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Bad enough that I about promise the S2H crew was high-fiving this morning knowing they will lose 0 sales to the NX6
 
I was excited about the 2-12 till I saw the reticle… Is it so hard to put a simple mil-dot reticle in????!!
 
Bad enough that I about promise the S2H crew was high-fiving this morning knowing they will lose 0 sales to the NX6

The “S2H crew” have been shooting the scopes for quite a while. I and Ryan would love NF to have made a real reticle.
 
Back
Top