- Joined
- Oct 22, 2014
- Messages
- 10,353
What an epic fail! And guys are buying these like crazy.
Wasn't yours wonky too, or was that picture from elsewhere @Ryan Avery ?Yes. This is the second one that has been evaled the same way or similar, by two different people, with two different rifles, and both failed. @sndmn11 physically broke the one he used.
Wasn't yours wonky too, or was that picture from elsewhere @Ryan Avery ?
Ha ha, I got a laugh out of that one. Thanks.
“It is rezeroed, and will sit in the back seat and checked periodically.” Why? Put ammo to good use on something else. Anything else.
I'll post the other picture once @JustSomeGuy35 hears back from them regarding warranty. I know they received it within a week of my test.That’s a different one.
I can't say I'm surprised by the results of the drop test, but I didn't expect to see the poor tracking when first zeroing.
To sight in, I pulled the bolt and looked through the bore, and adjusted the cross hairs. It probably doesn't matter in the grand scheme of things, but the Maven RF.1 and Maven CRF.1 both read 103 yards from bench to target.
View attachment 477205
Shots 2-7 are all within the 1" square below the bull. I then made 4 clicks up.
- Low about 1.5" and left about .5" -->adjust 6 clicks up 2 clicks right
- .5" and a bullet diameter low, no adjustment
- 1" low, no adjustment
- 1" low, no adjustment
- 1" low, no adjustment
- 3/4" low 1/4" left, no adjustment
- 3/4" low 1/8" left, no adjustment
Shots 8-12 were all within the 1" bull and made with no adjustments. The elevation turret was then removed, zero stop set, and turret set to 0. The windage turret was removed and set to 0. I made 10 clicks of vertical adjustment, which should have been 2.5MOA. It is possible that the cold bore (shot #1) was at the upper extreme of the cone of fire.
The fact that you and Form BOTH had wonky zeroing adjustments is seriously making me question whether I want to even keep one for a light-use rifle. Maybe as a "set and forget" setup but even then...why keep one?I had (potentia) unexpected zeroing adjustments as well, though not to the extreme as Form did. qhttps://rokslide.com/forums/threads/mini-eval-helos-btr-gen22-12x42-ahmr2-ffp-ir-moa.286981/
This is sort of funny because washboard roads have eaten way more of my scopes than dropping them ever did. I generally have a rifle that lives on the floorboard in front of my backseat through the 4 months of desert quail season, just in the event my bird dogs get into a battle with something that they need help with (badgers, coyotes, raccoons, etc.). Prior to switching to SWFA scopes, it was straight out of Mark Twain’s description of shooting a pepper box pistol in his book Roughing It. Every time you touched one off, you were equally guaranteed to cleanly miss a barn at 12 paces or to accidentally kill the neighbor’s prize mule at 200 yards.Because people still have this mistaken idea that in normal use they’ll work fine regardless of what happens in the drop eval. I want to show what happens with them when they just ride in a padded seat and get checked.
The fact that you and Form BOTH had wonky zeroing adjustments is seriously making me question whether I want to even keep one for a light-use rifle. Maybe as a "set and forget" setup but even then...why keep one?
Well, you have them already, why not check them? My guess is that they generally dial acceptably, and probably work as long as no real use is out on them- in other words, they are variable and they erectors binding will cause intermittent issues that pop up randomly and because of that, will be chalked up to “I missed”.
But you have them, do the drop eval on them.
He sent me the one I tested.
Just got the tracking number from Athlon today for my replacement scope. That was a pretty quick turn around. I appreciate the company standing by their warranty but I wish their products were more durable though.I'll post the other picture once @JustSomeGuy35 hears back from them regarding warranty. I know they received it within a week of my test.