That's the beauty here. JG may very well be the shit, I have no idea. OR, he may be a rich middle-aged fat guy who hires a guide to hunt in exotic locations like africa and mexico, and has been going on extravagant hunts to stave off the boredom of being fabulously wealthy, and has his guide sight in his rifle for him. Or both. Or neither. Frankly I dont give a rats behind if any of those things are true--here, just like all of us, he's just another guy with a funny handle who spends too much time arguing about scopes. Whether anyone is the shit or not is irrelevant--we're all nothing here beyond what we post. The difference is that some people show their work so you know how they arrive at their conclusions, and if you want to argue with it you can point to the merit of their methodology. JG on the other hand, refuses to provide any context to his claims, so we have no idea what standard he applies to his rifle, we have no idea if or how he verifies it, and frankly, if you refuse to provide context while insisting others are wrong, it's just hot air. "talk minus action=zilch". As stated before, "minute of deer" is worthless in this context, it's simply not relevant without more detail. Show your work, or at least describe it in detail so we can all understand the full context, and I'll give it every ounce of weight it deserves. Refuse to provide any context, and I'll continue to give it less credence than I do to those who show their work.