HuntHarder
WKR
I get right at or over 500 miles a tank on my 3.0 with 34" tires. A bigger tank would be even better tho.
So you get around 19 mpg?I get right at or over 500 miles a tank on my 3.0 with 34" tires. A bigger tank would be even better tho.
Mine is 23 i think. Iād love a 32.whats the biggest tank they equip on one of those?
Also howās the mpg towing?
A 30 gallon tank and I would be sold.Mine is 23 i think. Iād love a 32.
My 2021 2500 6.6 dmax got 15-16mpg empty and 10 with my 10k boat
My 2024 1500 3.0 dmax gets 23-24 empty and will do 16 with 10k boat
On paper maybe.The V8 tundras with 4:30 gears are rated to 9500-10k towing....a 4500 pound boat would be nothing for one of those trucks...
The 2.7 Ecoboost is the most reliable Ford half ton engine and gets fantastic mpg while very powerful and fun to drive.
I would only have a half ton diesel if someone gave it to me.
get on the forums or quick google search. Cast iron block like the power strokes, insane bottom end good to 700hp. Just complelty overbuilt. Itās the only engine from ford I would buy honestly since you canāt get the 7.3 gas in the f150. Much less problematic then the 3.5 and doesnāt have the oil consumption issues the 5.0 has.I had a dealer (that specializes in used half ton trucks of all brands) tell me they see more problems with the Ecoboost engines. He deals in large quantities and has owned several. He asked what I wanted to do with the truck and I said I will keep it forever, so he recommended the 5.0 over either Ecoboost.
I would love to get the 2.7 if I felt good about longevity and maintenance on it. Have more info?
When I had mine Iād routinely get 600-650 all stock. My tundra is lucky to get 325-350. Might be the ONLY thing I donāt like about the tundra. Give me a 30 gallon tank and let her drink!I get right at or over 500 miles a tank on my 3.0 with 34" tires. A bigger tank would be even better tho.
I see as many or more failures of non AFM lifters as AFM lifters...the rollers or bearings in them fail, chew cam up. 5.3, 6.2 and 6.6 gas engines all prone to it. Seems even more prevalent on the 2014+ direct injection engines Im fairly certain in part due to fuel contamination in the crank case from leaking high pressure fuel pump...but I'm not a failure analysis engineer.Like has been mentioned a couple times, the variable cylinder tech with gm is plain bad. My 6.2 has had significant issues, I know 2 other guys with 6.2s that have had significant issues as well. I do have one friend with a 2020 6.2 with about 50k on it that hasn't has any issues.
Another thing to consider with the 6.2 is its only available in their upper trim packages, which, in the case of my denali, gets you magnaride suspension, which is silly expensive to fix and the parts themselves don't have a very long lifespan.
I didn't vote because I don't know the answer as I'm currently trying to decide what I do for my next truck.
Just some food for thought OP...
I've worked on them all and have many acquaintances in the repair industry in both independent and dealer shops...
GM is in a bad place quality and supply wise. It's not improved much since the covid years.
Lifters/cams/crankshafts/high-pressure fuel pumps leaking into block on all v8 gas engines since 2014/extensive 6,8and 10spd transmission failures, transfer case/actuator issues. Many of these failures under 100k on well maintained/not abused vehicles, Suspension components not holding up as well as they used to either.
The bigger issue is supply of parts to make repairs. I hear "sorry, that's on back order" more GM than all other makes combined these days.
I dont have any type of brand loyalty, but GM is on the bottom of my list from a long term quality and product support standpoint from 22 years of first hand experience.
Some people love them and have decent luck but I've seen to many major failures to ever consider a gm vehicle myself as i keep everything well beyond warranty...maybe an L5P Duramax with 6spd Allison being the lone stand out.
As others have said the f150 in 5.0L or 2.7L are decent options. Rear springs could use some help on them, easy fix. The 10spd trans supposedly was ironed out for 2022+ models...prior to that they have some extensive issues and are seeing fair number of major failures north of 50k miles.
I love my pre '22 5.7L tundras. Hands down the most long term reliable 1/2ton made in my experience... but they do lack in pay load and fuel economy.
In stock form they ride great, lifted/leveled cheaply with oversized wheels/tires...not so much.
Only weak point on Suspension is rear springs...easy fix with air bags, RAS or custom springs. That said, I wouldnt drive one everyday the mileage you do unless fuel expense is zero issue. Stock you can average 15-16...17-18 highway...bigger wheels tires 13-15mpg...they are thirsty.
My 2016 crewmax hunting/camping rig weighs about 8500lbs loaded...over 9k coming back from wyoming with 3 butcher elk last year(far from stock Suspension)...we averaged 11.6mpg round trip over 3k miles.
That same truck unloaded at about 7800 lbs moves 6k lbs loaded trailer just fine...you know its there, but it doesnt struggle towing it...
all the tundra talk is irrelevant to whatvyour after, they dont fit your bill...more just debunking a couple things posted by others earlier on the tundra.
I've not seen many Ram mentions...short of exhaust manifold bolts breaking, front axles/stub shafts and some wheel bearing and ball joints the 1500 rams with 5.7L have been pretty solid in regard to major powertrain issues to north of 200k on the regular. I see more very neglected Rams than others for some reason. Many come in unsafe to be on the road, but engines still run and trans shift fine.Have seen a few lifter failures but nowhere near the volume of the GMs. They do little better on the fuel than tundra but not a lot.
If your gonna buy new its all pretty irrelevant, just pick whatever you like driving the best, buy the extended warranty upfront and re evaluate when you get near warranty expiration...Id still avoid GM though, warranty no good if truck is down indefinitely waiting on parts to become available.
On my 3rd 6.2 I bought the tuner on the way home from the dealer. That engine was the one that grenaded at 28k miles. I'd still be concerned about the 6.2 dropping lifters, AFM/DFM or not.Thank you for the info and the write up. That 4 cylinder deactivation is a glaring concern. I believe there are some tunes that ditch it. If I go with a 6.2 this may be something that I look into. I want to like the 3.5 EB just because it's quick and Im pleased with the interior. But also my annual mileage would suggest I would be spending some coin on repairs. I have a buddy with the 2.7 EB, no complaints from him, but he doesn't tow. He has an expedition with the 3.5 EB that's his family/boat hauler.