if only there was an article you could read to answer your questions about what's in the article.
No doubt. Look at the world we live in. Society is slowly accepting that its OK for a 6 year old to declare that theyre the opposite gender and start taking hormone therapy. The government officials that are not prosecuting the parents and physicians are the same ones that are going to steamroll the population with whatever mandates they see fit.
Hey, look it's one of those people who wants to impose their will on others.
Obviously you didn’t read the article that you cited. The article stated vaccines would help reduce the rate at which the virus mutates. But then the virologists states that the virus was only spreading via unvaccinated people.
No evidence the vaccines are effective? That data is available in troves for anyone who cares to look. No offense, but that is a massively ignorant take.
that's not what he said though. Once again, this is an exercise in "clip out only the words convenient for me."
How can that not be a reasonable inference considering the now known action of the virus in the two linked articles? You think you need clinical trials to prove that its better to not be obese with this virus when we know its behavior?
That has nothing to do with obesity or health in general. Leave politics out of it. Its irrelevant and only clouds judgement with emotional responses.
They still have no idea if mutations are coming from vaxed or unvaxed.
And to be fair to him, (the author)
"We observed that obese people are likely to have worse outcomes" is different than "losing weight will protect you against hospitalization." The first result I linked regarding the outcomes for overweight people hospitalized (better outcomes., pre-COVID) illustrates that. We don't need a clinical trial, we have other data we can look at, and sure enough there's strong correlations between vaccine status, income, and obesity as well as between vaccine status and hospitalization and outcome. So what we do know is that getting vaccinated is something easy you can do that, no matter your weight, provides protection against hospitalization. I would suspect if we were also looking at other health conditions (history of smoking, lung disease, alcohol consumption, diabetes, etc, all things that also correlate well to poverty) we could see some strong correlations between those and positive health outcomes.
www.nature.com
www.cdc.gov
This may be the first thing that we have agreed on. It doesn't make me happy that kids are changing their sexes at a young age, but I would never tell someone what to do in regards to my opinions. What bothers me is when we are made to look bad because we don't support it. What bothers me even more is when people aggresively demand that we respect them and their lifestyles.
Nice way to dance around the actual question asked. I'm pretty sure you knew exactly what he was referring to but chose to do the dance...Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)
CDC provides credible COVID-19 health information to the U.S.
They have a nice chart. Variants are named and added to the "variants being monitored" list when they occur in enough number to merit closer inspection, variants of concern. That list starts with Alpha and goes on through the Greek alphabet. We mostly only heard about the variants of concern, Delta and Omicron.
no i was being a smart ass and their was no actual real question behind it. I dont really care how they name it but i figured i would get some kind of cool link
A scientist/researcher friend of mine were joking months ago about which one would get the big hype, Omicron we decided. Well geez whadda you know!
Well they did skip over a couple for well you know, leftist reasoning so they wouldn't offend anyone or anything. Which is quite ironic because they went to this naming system to avoid offending anyone or anything from the previously used system.
