The recoil calculators I’ve used do not account for pressure. Now I could be wrong but I don’t see how it’s possible to run 6.5prc velocities without having 6.5prc recoil. Would be nice to see both tested in a recoil sled.In theory, what you said makes a lot of sense and is what I was thinking at first but:
- I ran the numbers in a recoil calculator. Leaving bullet weight (153gr), velocity, and gun weight all the same, and ONLY changing the powder charge, the CM was 19.4% less recoil than the PRC.
- Also, SAC released a short video of them necking down a 6.5 CM +Peak case to a 6 CM. They said these dies are coming out this summer.
Only time will tell, but I think there's a much larger conversation here with the barrel and case technology advancing this rapidly. I truly think the 6.5 CM could literally be a much less recoiling 6.5 PRC performance cartridge. Which brings me back to my original question, if we can push larger bullets faster without the recoil penalty, should the pendulum swing back toward the 6.5 (or 25) rather than the 6? Or are there still more advantages to staying with the 6mm that I'm not thinking of?
I appreciate everyone's responses and please keep the feedback and discussion going!
Good to know there are no issues necking down to 6mm.
