Turkeytider
WKR
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2023
- Messages
- 369
Yeah, I`m not at all questioning people changing out the stocks, that`s an individual call, just sort of marveling at how many appear to do so. Just me, but if I fork out a thousand bucks or so for a gun I`d like to think that I can shoot it as is, LOL!Sure, plenty of people (Id guess the vast majority) use them and they are quite good stocks if you compare to other factory plastic stocks. But in most (all?) cases if someone had the choice between the oem plastic and a stiffer carbon fiber stock, they wouldnt choose the plastic. In this case the OP stated a $2000 budget for the bare rifle and was talking about a “build” as an option possibly stretching that budget, so I see the point made being that for well under 75% of the budget you can take a stainless tikka and put it in a very good quality aftermarket stock resulting in a gun with near-custom quality that very few people could rationally justify “upgrading” from that point at any price. Then you can put the difference into a truly reliable optic, and/or into ammo to practice.
If the base model tikka was a budget stretch to begin with, thats when Id start to question people suggesting a stock replacement. If people are on a budget I think many times the stock suggestion is often a future option, ie a “if you ever want to upgrade you have the option since there are a decent # of options for a tikka”…I think in many cases its thrown out as a possible down the road benefit rather than an immediate suggestion, even though its clearly taken as a immediate suggestion sometimes.