- Thread Starter
- #21
Negative.So what is going to suck for us is the point system for tags. We were considering Illinois due to not having to go through that system. Correct me if I am wrong but Ohio is a point system state too, right?
OH is over the counter, also look up information on guys on this post that talk about public land on your post.So what is going to suck for us is the point system for tags. We were considering Illinois due to not having to go through that system. Correct me if I am wrong but Ohio is a point system state too, right?
I think the OP wants BIG bucks, Michigan don't compare to Ohio IMO. I hunted Michigan for 5 years. There are some good deer there though.Lol. And in contrast, Michigan has 4.6 million acres of state owned public land, 3.6 million acres of federally owned public land and an additional 2.2 million acres of CFL land where hunting, fishing, and trapping are allowed.
I'm thinking Wingshooter's comment was comparative.
No argument there. While you can find big bucks in Michigan, if you don't do some serious scouting, the odds are that you'll see a lot of does, some year and a half old bucks and if you're lucky, a few 2 1/2 year-olds. Michigan has an abundance of hunters who are quite happy to shoot young bucks, not that theres anything wrong with it.I think the OP wants BIG bucks, Michigan don't compare to Ohio IMO. I hunted Michigan for 5 years. There are some good deer there though.
The U.P was by far the least crowded area to huntNo argument there. While you can find big bucks in Michigan, if you don't do some serious scouting, the odds are that you'll see a lot of does, some year and a half old bucks and if you're lucky, a few 2 1/2 year-olds. Michigan has an abundance of hunters who are quite happy to shoot young bucks, not that theres anything wrong with it.
That said, I've seen some good mature bucks killed on Michigan public every year, some by people who get lucky, some by guys who spend a lot of time scouting and some by guys who use very unorthodox tactics to cover a lot of ground.
I haven't been to the UP in a few years now, but I've heard that wolves have done a number on the deer in several counties.The U.P was by far the least crowded area to hunt
Could have. I hunted there 90-95. I still know people getting stationed there and some locals and tell them spots. We did wolf counts with DNR when I was there with our helos, pretty cool being from the south.I haven't been to the UP in a few years now, but I've heard that wolves have done a number on the deer in several counties.
We are just wanting the opportunity to shoot something 140”ish or close to it.I think the OP wants BIG bucks, Michigan don't compare to Ohio IMO. I hunted Michigan for 5 years. There are some good deer there though.
And not very many hunting it these days. I hunted in Wayne every year for 30 years . Starting in the late 80s. There was a hunter on every ridge back then. By the last year we hunted ( two years ago) it we had the area we hunted to yourselves. We are older now and enjoy hunting on farms in NW Ohio so we dont go down. If you cant find a place in Wayne to hunt your not looking very hard. I would agree other parts of the state have less public lands. I killed this buck in Wayne about five years ago., You’re joking right? Wayne national forest covers like hundreds of thousand acres. There’s lots of public land in Ohio.
Crossbow's have changed the game and should be a different season. Anyone old enough to shoot a gun can shoot an xbow lol... Or ban the bait, be lots of wankers thenThe crossbows are killing Michigans archery season, the pressure is crazy during October/ early November. When the Automotive strike was happening the woods were covered up in hunters.
Rifle season here is quiet compared to how it used to be. Theres also 3 rifle seasons in September, before archery. Lots of big bucks getting hammered early doors. Plus if most guys buy the Combo license they get 2 buck tags… and they’re gonna fill those, size rarely matters here.
Michigan is mismanaged like no other. Yes, we do have lots of state land, it’s a shame we can’t get the herd and DNR under control cause we do have deer and lots of potential.
NY has the same issue. With 2 bucks people shoot that first one that walks by and hold out for a bigger one after. But here I can shoot multiple doe.I hear very little whining about crossbows in Michigan. What I'm hearing in this thread pretty much echos my sentiments when compound bows became common. Personally I'd rather see everyone go back to traditional archery equipment, no cams pulleys or sights, but I'm not blaming any lack of success that I might experience on someone else's choice to use a legal, more technologically advanced method to hunt. If it launches an arrow with a string and energy supplied by flexed limbs, it's archery.
Should Michigan go to a single antlered deer per hunter per season? In my opinion absolutely. Michigan has a lot of deer but a skewed sex ratio. If they continue to sell combo tags, it should be 1 antlered, and one antlerless for the combo. In the centrapnamd southern lower peninsula, I think too many people hold out for a second buck and pass on does that really need to be removed.