Or people could just by the Minox ZP5 and find out why others have said they're superior to NF ...NF would need to steal Swarovski or S&B’s coating recipes and they would be in good shape.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Or people could just by the Minox ZP5 and find out why others have said they're superior to NF ...NF would need to steal Swarovski or S&B’s coating recipes and they would be in good shape.
Hi Chris, I don't think I've read your other posts on this issue (and haven't read the rest of this thread yet), but have you checked out the Maven ZP5 with THLR reticle? Form posted an eval and Q&A thread - lots of examples in there of the reticle in real-life conditions. To save cluttering this thread with unnecessary info, feel free to ask any questions in the ZP5 Q&A thread and I'm sure @Formidilosus, @mxgsfmdpx, myself, or Ryan will be happy to help.That's me. Not sure you're referring specifically to me, but that's absolutely me. You may not realize this but those long-range western scenarios also have animals moving at dawn and dusk. It ain't always midday shooting at an elk on snow.
That was probably a relatively small sample size. More telling would be the runs on SWFA and Maven RS1.2s ...It drove the hell out of Minox sales in the last couple of months, if @EuroOptic recent special shipment is any indicator.
Yes ... and in the case of Nightforce, remember that their key markets are mil/LE, benchrest, ELR, and some LR comp - not hunting.No excuses given, just a logical reasoning. Clearly Nightforce isn't hurting for $$. The guys at the top of most* companies care about 1 thing. $$
That was probably a relatively small sample size. More telling would be the runs on SWFA and Maven RS1.2s ...
For sure: if EuroOptic's source had given them more ZP5 THLRs, they would have sold more.Perhaps, in terms of overall units sold. But from Minox's perspective, they may very well have 5x'd their quarterly sales of the ZP5 in the United States from this one sale. If not quite a bit more, given they basically don't market it here.
@Ryan Avery: can we have this on a t-shirt? Can we? Can we? Can we?If I wanted an xmas tree I would
Move to the North Pole and work for Santa
Weeelll ... there is the NF>Horus>Todd H connection, so ...20 MIL grid....
Who designs these reticles?
They're read by far more people than just regular Roksliders ... we know that from a range of industry sources.It’s wild how many Random people refer to the drop test evals.
Except they aren’t 30mm format, weigh 30 oz, and the reticles are more busy than a Midland dealer on payday. I’m sure they are great, and proven durable, but I’m not seeing what wishlist box they check?Or people could just by the Minox ZP5 and find out why others have said they're superior to NF ...![]()
Clearly. I was just responding to your point about optical clarity. Multiple people in the LR/PRS world commented on the better optics of the ZP5 to the ATACRs when they arrived in the US.Except they aren’t 30mm format, weigh 30 oz
and the reticles are more busy than a Midland dealer on payday.
That's also pretty well covered in the ZP5 Q&A thread here. Specialised, sure, but an amazing dedicated LR option.I’m sure they are great, and proven durable, but I’m not seeing what wishlist box they check?
Now you're getting closer to what the "RokScope" is doing ... although very few serious people want MOA these days, for good reason.Just call LOW up, have them take a 30mm NF chassis off the line, make it 3-18x50, optics of a Swaro Z8, convert a March DR-1F reticle to MOA and bump back the heavy stadia so I have 10 MOA of hash at max mag, plop it in then sell me 6 of them.
Except they've had reliability issues ...Hell, if Deon could dial back the mag and shrink down a wide angle Majesta optical system into a March-F chassis, they’d pretty much have it down.