News that’s gonna rock the mule deer world!

Mike 338

WKR
Joined
Dec 28, 2012
Messages
703
Location
Idaho
Well, it's sorta like when a guy wins the lottery. It's very awesome... for him and his family and even fun for his friends. Yes, most impressive buck and congratulations to the hunter. I on the other hand, am pretty jacked about the newsletter informing me when merino long johns arrive in sizes other than small and XXXL.
 
Joined
Dec 10, 2018
Messages
454
Location
Santa Rosa Ca
sure man, good discussion. The big picture is that Colorado managed deer virtually the same in the modern era up until 1999 when they went to statewide quota on deer tags. By 2004, they were cranking out big deer and most people (not all) agreed that the herds were in much better shape (better buck;doe ratios and all that goes along with that).

Yes there are troubled units/herds, but on a statewide level, they are doing a pretty good job when they can offer opportunity like they do (300" bucks are coming off the AZ strip, but try and get a tag!) and produce historical deer like this.

To my knowledge, not one of these three 300+-inch bucks came from units that were managed for trophies (I might be wrong because I don't pry!).

The "data" is in the record books, and the record book shows (2005 all time B&C, my most recent) that the last buck that netted over 290" (they don't list gross, so I'm allowing for an inflated gross score) was "PR 1981", then a second in 1972, and then 1962 (then going back the other way, nothing until the Lopez buck in 2007, unless I missed one!).

So that is 3 in 20 years from '62 to '82 and those years were a lot closer to the "hay-day" of mule deer than we are now, but we just did 3 in 11 years. Now I know that people were much less likely to enter them during those early years, so this isn't a completely fair comparision... I get that.

But when people say mule deer are on their heels, gene pools are gone, no big deer again, I say look at Colorado. Heck, look about anywhere they get some management, big bucks and healthier herds are often but not always the results (Utah comes to mind right now). And according to the good bios I've talked to, when there are older age class deer in a herd, other good things are happening to cause that age class like good fawn:doe ratios, buck survival, habitat in good shape.
Can you guys point some of that good management advise towards Ca? We’ve had some changes in the last couple of years and I’m very hopeful that it’s a step in the right direction but, at the same time when you look at the other choices they’ve made...
 

SWOHTR

WKR
Joined
Aug 1, 2016
Messages
1,579
Location
Briney foam
Nice deer! It looks like there's a hard-to-deny trend of conservation success and animal size occurring (thinking about the bulll taken in MT three years ago).
 

IH8Cali

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
Dec 15, 2018
Messages
171
Location
Utah
Can you guys point some of that good management advise towards Ca?

You have a state legislature that is disinterested in providing for hunting opportunity. There are still one or two good X zones that hold big deer (and those on private land), however it's only a matter of time.
 

Jbehredt

WKR
Joined
Mar 4, 2017
Messages
1,805
Location
Colorado
I used to shoot a doe about every year on my rifle elk hunts. Just bumped into them and took one because the 1st combined season meant we had tags. Glad they stopped that. Don’t think I’d still be doing it but LOTS of deer were getting killed as a side show back in the 90s.
 

fngTony

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jan 18, 2016
Messages
5,824
I’m really interested in what about Colorado’s management strategy equated to producing something like this? Could be good practice for other states to follow.

Also I missed the gps coordinations, can someone post them?
 

squirrel

WKR
Joined
May 25, 2017
Messages
339
Location
colorado
Colorado is not exporting their "expertise" we are doing everything in our power within mandated parameters to joining the other states racing to forky land.

A direct quote from meeting... "people just want to shoot two points"
 
OP
robby denning

robby denning

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Feb 25, 2012
Messages
15,801
Location
SE Idaho
I’m really interested in what about Colorado’s management strategy equated to producing something like this? Could be good practice for other states to follow.

Well, in its simplest form, they quit managing deer on a near statewide level to an individual herd level, and went to limited quota tags. Now the biologist in charge of one herd can lower or raise tags numbers according to what’s going on in that herd, it regardless of what’s going on somewhere else in the state.

Pre-1999, it was virtually straight OTC with only a change in season dates to manage herds, which was very ineffective compared to the cap-on-licenses strategy Colorado has now.

Utah adopted a similar strategy not too many seasons after Colorado.

Nevada/AZ has always in my life managed like Colorado is now

Idaho, Wyoming, MT manage pretty much like Colorado used to.

This is a very simplistic overview for discussions sake.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

N2TRKYS

WKR
Joined
Apr 17, 2016
Messages
4,246
Location
Alabama
If the units that have produced the 300"+ bucks in the last 11 years take little to no points to draw, then how is restricted tags helping them? Doesn't that mean that not many people want them, if it's a second or third choice type deal?
 

LandYacht

WKR
Joined
Jan 25, 2014
Messages
773
Location
Frisco
How that doesn’t get someone motivated to sit through late afternoon lightning and sleet storms is beyond me.......#metoo


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

hobbes

WKR
Joined
Jun 6, 2012
Messages
2,407
I could be mistaken, but the archery hunters barely put a dent in the numbers. It's the limit on rifle hunting as the rut approaches that makes the biggest difference. A unit that takes 0 to 1 to draw in archery season takes a lot more points to draw a 4th season rifle tag.
 

tdhanses

WKR
Joined
Sep 26, 2018
Messages
5,941
I’m really interested in what about Colorado’s management strategy equated to producing something like this? Could be good practice for other states to follow.

Also I missed the gps coordinations, can someone post them?

Having all draw tags, staggered short seasons and no hunting during the rut has to help.
 
OP
robby denning

robby denning

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Feb 25, 2012
Messages
15,801
Location
SE Idaho
If the units that have produced the 300"+ bucks in the last 11 years take little to no points to draw, then how is restricted tags helping them? Doesn't that mean that not many people want them, if it's a second or third choice type deal?

Not really because there is still a cap on rifle tags for those herds, and it’s largely rifle hunters who determine buck numbers, not archery hunters.

It’s commonly known that most archery tags go out between zero and two points, (outside the premium units) while the rifle tags in most units, especially for a third season where you can really put the hurt on these bucks, require more points than that, i.e. more demand/pressure/harvest.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
OP
robby denning

robby denning

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Feb 25, 2012
Messages
15,801
Location
SE Idaho
Hobbes, Didn’t then see your post before I wrote mine. Agreed

Tdhanses, Colorado allows a lot of rut hunting in the 3rd/4th season, but tags are capped, that’s what is helping.

Back in the 1990s, there wasn’t even such thing as a fourth season. That came about because of improved buck numbers. Colorado couldn’t even handle a third season back in the 1990s on the OTC system.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
OP
robby denning

robby denning

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Feb 25, 2012
Messages
15,801
Location
SE Idaho
So, they do take a lot of points to draw. That’s what I figured.

The rifle tags in some cases, but this is an archery buck, so when we’ve been posting the points required, we’re talking about archery.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

tdhanses

WKR
Joined
Sep 26, 2018
Messages
5,941
Hobbes, Didn’t then see your post before I wrote mine. Agreed

Tdhanses, Colorado allows a lot of rut hunting in the 3rd/4th season, but tags are capped, that’s what is helping.

Back in the 1990s, there wasn’t even such thing as a fourth season. That came about because of improved buck numbers. Colorado couldn’t even handle a third season back in the 1990s on the OTC system.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

According to the biologists there is no season during the peak of the rut per last weeks phone conf. But now that you say it, 4th season without looking at dates has to be close or in it, must of meant they are not going to open that up to more tags, these probably take a few pts to draw.
 
Last edited:
Top