New Swaro 75mm - 52.6 oz!

Within same ballpark as the 80mm ATS/STS
This might be a hot take, but the ATS/STS FOV is outdated and needs to be improved.

How many decades has it been 108ft at 1000 yards for the 20-60? This is coming from someone that has an STS with both the 25-50 and 20-60 eyepiece. It's really the only thing I don't like about it and the number one reason I keep threatening to upgrade.
 
Well, rainy day here, but new shiny toy, so I put it up beside my 554 looking through a dirty window lol.

Resolution is definitely better on the Swaro, and comfort behind it is way better. But the little Kowa is pretty sweet as well. I looked at a cell tower a half mile or so away and the difference was obvious but man the baby Kowa is bad (as in good).

Also it’s 55.3 oz on my scale with both covers. I’ll remove the rear cover and use a Mountain Mag adapter and cover so that should be a wash.

Hope to get it out to my 1000 yard range one evening this week for more comparison.

IMG_4042.jpeg
 
Well, rainy day here, but new shiny toy, so I put it up beside my 554 looking through a dirty window lol.

Resolution is definitely better on the Swaro, and comfort behind it is way better. But the little Kowa is pretty sweet as well. I looked at a cell tower a half mile or so away and the difference was obvious but man the baby Kowa is bad (as in good).

Also it’s 55.3 oz on my scale with both covers. I’ll remove the rear cover and use a Mountain Mag adapter and cover so that should be a wash.

Hope to get it out to my 1000 yard range one evening this week for more comparison.

View attachment 1095380
I’d be curious about it against the upgraded Kowa 55. I went from the 553 to the 55a and the difference was substantial.
 
Was that substantial difference mostly FOV/user friendliness with the new eyepiece or did you see noticeable glass quality upgrades as well?

mainly FOV and just overall usability but I think there was a bump up in glass quality. Very useable throughout the entire range as well.
 
Back
Top