207-12A
Lil-Rokslider
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2017
- Messages
- 237
If you could put it a loaded and chambered bolt action in a holster, would you do so without a safety?
These are redundant questions/ the answer is no. In every other firearm we use, Manuel safeties are demanded- they don’t even make them without. This isn’t that pistols can’t be used without a safety, I am not a boomer yelling at the clouds. I carry and use striker pistols without safeties, and have from nearly two decades. It does change how I handle them- mostly reholstering appendix. However, they should have had an ergonomic thumb safeties from the beginning. There are no downsides to good thumb safeties, and multiples upsides.
Whether I liked them or not, it certainly wouldn’t stop me from choosing the most shootable pistol ever made.
How does a beavertail make a pistol safe?
How much do you want to spend?
1. A striker fired pistol and a long gun have extremely different triggers which makes it okay to holster loaded and (manual) safety-less pistols in a quality kydex holster with proper training. You would never sling a loaded pistol over your back, carry it strapped (unprotected) to a backpack, etc. The use dictates the level of safety that I require on a firearm.
2. There are downsides to thumb safeties, especially those on striker fired pistols. Do you have monster sized (or too small) hands? Now maybe you need to break your grip to defeat the safety (do that in a high pressure situation without training - and most people do not train with pistols to competently and safely use them). Additionally, 1911 style giant lever safeties are easy to keep from unintentionally re-engaging while managing recoil, but some modern striker fired's cannot say the same. Circle back to the same "do you train enough" idea.
3. Finally, if there's no downsides to good thumb safeties, why not have two on your pistol? Three?