Durable Gun
Lil-Rokslider
- Joined
- Nov 4, 2025
- Messages
- 130
I feel genuinely terrible for starting this thread...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So is that why it's called a PH3? Bc 3% of you are going to need the warranty?Until u mentioned weight goal I was gonna say ph3 but since you are looking for a lightweight I suggest proof research elevation 2.0 (though u would not have the ARCA. Just get a ph3... If u happen to be an unlucky "3%" Glenn Seeking will treat you right.
Sorry for finding this humorous. You seem very passionate. I love it.Holy hell, for the last time, the warranty rate is 2%, not 3%…. Massive difference between the two… Seekins has had ~300 guns come back from ~15k guns sold.
1/2 of those (or 150 guns) came back for accuracy not being up to expectations, yet Glen stated separately that > 25% of those with “accuracy issues” were due to poorly installed rings/scopes. The other half came back for everything from stock imperfections to light firing pin strikes..
Tikka would have a higher “warranty” rate than Seekins if their policy was as liberal in coverage, and as easy/quick to file and handle.
Tikka would have a higher “warranty” rate than Seekins if their policy was as liberal in coverage, and as easy/quick to file and handle.
Not coping with anything. Just stating my experience and opinion. Perhaps I’m an outlier but I own handful of Seekins and Tikka. Every single one of my Seekins has outshot every single one of my Tikkas out of the box, and has been materially more forgiving when it came to ammo. Combine that with the fact that I’ve never had a single issue with any of my Seekins as far as function and fire, and I guess I’m just a bit loyal.No- they wouldn’t. You are making excuses and coping. There are no threads with person after person with legitimate Tikka/Sako/Blaser/Sauer problems. When someone has a legitimate issue with a tikka, it’s- “that sucks, never seen it” from almost everyone.
I have seen hundreds of of Tikka’s- 1x 7mm-08, 1x 7mm RM, and 1x 223 were picky with ammo- that is they didn’t shoot nearly everything well, though they shot some ammo exceptionally well. The one 7mm RM was the only one sent back to Tikka, and they replaced the barrel without fuss. The 7mm-08 shot the ammo that the individual wanted it to shoot, so he didn’t care. The 223 is one of the school rifles and shoots everything to about 1.75 MOA 10 round groups, but shoots 77gr TMK’s to under 1.3 MOA- @Nine Banger used it to kill a bear.
No US manufacturer produces rifles with the quality and consistency of European, Scandinavian, and Finnish manufacturers. That is a fact.
Not coping with anything. Just stating my experience and opinion. Perhaps I’m an outlier but I own handful of Seekins and Tikka. Every single one of my Seekins has outshot every single one of my Tikkas out of the box, and has been materially more forgiving when it came to ammo. Combine that with the fact that I’ve never had a single issue with any of my Seekins as far as function and fire, and I guess I’m just a bit loyal.
I genuinely believe the warranty rate would be higher for Tikkas than Seekins if Tikka’s policy was as accepting, liberal in coverage, and easy to file. I have a couple I certainly would have sent back over the years for being so picky.
I have a Tikka 6PRC getting built so certainly not a Tikka hater, just sharing my experience and views.
For context on what this failure rate looks like for large scale production, the current gen Toyota Tundra engine failures are occurring at a ~1% rate. And that is enough to recall hundreds of thousands of trucks for preemptive full engine replacement, and destroy the reputation of the most reliable vehicle on the road.But you are stating your views as facts- when this very thread shows otherwise. Not only that, your sample set is small.
However- my issue wasn’t that Seekins rifles are bad- they’re probably some of the better “custom” actioned M700’s available. My point was- 2% to 3% warranty rate, acknowledging a firing pin spring issue; and then justifying it and being ok with it, if not pleased with it.
Again, if Tikka/Sako/Sauer/Blaser/etc had a 2-3% return rate- employees would be fired, and/or practices corrected. They would not, and do not accept that level of “problems”.
I have 1 Seekins, an element hunter purchased this summer. I had to send it in for warranty work due to extremely stiff bolt lift and poor accuracy. They rebuilt the rifle onto a new action, said they cleaned up the chamber and re-mounted the same barrel to the new action. They test fired it, sent pictures of impressive groups, and sent it back to me. The rifle still shot like garbage. I sent it back a second time, they test fired it, said it shot fine and returned it to me with an extra fixed stock, stating that the new stock may make it easier to shoot. The issue is, Seekins only tested 1 type of ammo and only shot 3 shot groups. The 143gr eldx, that they used to shoot test groups, does shoot well out of the rifle, but nothing else does. The accuracy difference between the eldx and everything else tested in substantial. The rifle is extremely sensitive and picky in regards to loads it likes (143gr eldx being the only one I’ve found so far). This rifle is used to hunt in CA, so I have to use copper. I have a load that shoots good enough, but a far cry from the accuracy I would expect for the price I paid.
Seekins customer service was pretty good and they tried to do right by me. The problem is that I had to use their warranty. What about those customers who get a lemon, but don’t use the warranty? How many of those are out there driving their failure rate over 3% to who knows what %?
I was in a Scheels handling Seekins they had on the rack the other day. Of the 5 rifles, one had the same stiff bolt lift my rifle suffered from. So just from handling 6 rifles perosnally, 2 had out of spec actions. That is a 33% failure rate from this sample. They are trying to say they have a 3% failure rate? That doesn’t add up.
I like Seekiin’s innovation and product line. Their customer service, when you eventually get ahold of them, is great. However, they have a QC opportunity they need to address
The same friend in my above anecdote had his rifle crap out and had to send it in right before hunting season. Borrowed one of my Tikkas that year. Another aspect to consider, things can go bad at just the wrong time.As I read all these comments the one pain I see missing is the return of a bad gun. Years ago I remember walking into UPS or Fed Ex and shipping a gun. Not today or at least in my area of Atlanta. I don’t care if it’s for repairs the companies ( store outlets) will not take a gun. I had a Rizzini .410 that needed a little work on the spring to help the gun open easier after firing. So I had to get a shipping label from the Rizzini distributor. Then I had to take the gun to the main UPS office to ship. After that the gun was “ lost” in the system for 30 days. I did my research and saw nearly 3000 guns are lost or stolen every year after going into one of the major carrier’s system. I got some top officials from UPS involved and my gun was found 30 days later and 1200 miles in wrong direction of destination. It was a $9000 gun and I am sure it was gonna be gone to a pawn shop in another week. So all the folks dealing with this Seekins problem I wish you the best. Might be without a resolution for a while.