Muscular Endurance for Mountain Athletes

OP
P

Poser

WKR
Joined
Dec 27, 2013
Messages
5,407
Location
Durango CO
I can see that, I have access to a pretty steep trail, but even with 110 pounds my heart rate is up in zone 4. I'll have to chase down some steeper slopes.

I agree with the others: no need to be training with that kind of weight. Reduce the weight, use steeper terrain. I did a pack out recently that was 140 lbs. It was stupid and it sucked etc, but there's no benefit I can see to train with that kind of packweight. Get your muscular endurance in order with a conventional pack weight and use the gym to get strong so you can shoulder that can weight on the occasion that you need to.
 

mtwarden

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 18, 2016
Messages
10,243
Location
Montana
Got another one in Sunday— longer at 1.3 miles w/ 1950' gain, roughly the same steepness (we did an additional 6-ish miles w/ very little gain, almost all down hill).

I think I was calculating slope degree wrong. I was using distance traveled with ascent putting it into a calculator that shows both grade % and degrees. Looking at it, they use the "horizontal travel" and ascent; horizontal travel is not the long side of the triangle, the long side is the actual distance traveled—so that shortened up (not a lot, but a little) the one side I needed to enter w/ the ascent. Had to brush up a bit to the horizontal travel side—who said geometry would never be useful :ROFLMAO:

Both of these were pretty close to 20 degrees, which IMHO you're not going to get much steeper without being on your toes the entire time and most likely pulling on rocks/vegetation to help get you up the slope.

We were able to carry on a conversation the entire way up and according to my watch pretty solidly in Zone 2 (occasional Zone 3).

Like the prior session, pretty sore/fatigued legs, but not sore enough I couldn't hike my regular trails the next day.
 

mtbraun

FNG
Joined
Jul 6, 2023
Messages
96
Got another one in Sunday— longer at 1.3 miles w/ 1950' gain, roughly the same steepness (we did an additional 6-ish miles w/ very little gain, almost all down hill).

I think I was calculating slope degree wrong. I was using distance traveled with ascent putting it into a calculator that shows both grade % and degrees. Looking at it, they use the "horizontal travel" and ascent; horizontal travel is not the long side of the triangle, the long side is the actual distance traveled—so that shortened up (not a lot, but a little) the one side I needed to enter w/ the ascent. Had to brush up a bit to the horizontal travel side—who said geometry would never be useful :ROFLMAO:

Both of these were pretty close to 20 degrees, which IMHO you're not going to get much steeper without being on your toes the entire time and most likely pulling on rocks/vegetation to help get you up the slope.

We were able to carry on a conversation the entire way up and according to my watch pretty solidly in Zone 2 (occasional Zone 3).

Like the prior session, pretty sore/fatigued legs, but not sore enough I couldn't hike my regular trails the next day.

I suspect the eccentric contractions while working the downs are very beneficial also.
 

mtwarden

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 18, 2016
Messages
10,243
Location
Montana
I suspect the eccentric contractions while working the downs are very beneficial also.

I think so; we didn't go back down the way we came up as that might have been a wee bit painful :), but we still lost a lot of elevation w/ weight on out backs.
 
Top