Mountain Goat caliber in Kimber Montana?

Muttly

WKR
Joined
Apr 30, 2014
Messages
578
Location
Ketchikan, AK
The great debate, part twenty eight, or thereabouts.. Getting married in August, so theres a bit of a spending freeze on bows, guns, and such, which gives me plenty of time to ponder, plot, and scheme in the eternal quest for the next great "this is the last one, the ultimate, after this, I,ll be set for life" class of firearm, at least, till the next one..

Picked up the first Montana this last fall, a two fitty seven Bob. And became hooked on light rifles within the first two shots. Had a screaming deal on a .264 Win Mag round the same time, a Win 70. Have a sneaking suspicion it might be cheaper and easier to buy a Montana in a larger caliber than to try and put the .264 on a diet?.. Caliber wise the .264 might be pretty skookum for goat, but no first hand experience in that regard.

So I find myself thinking that probably the path of least resistance is to somewhere along the way round up a Montana in a more goat/bear/moose/ miscellaneous big, and or tough critter worthy caliber.

Not ruling out the Mountain Ascent, looking at both. I,m thinking the likeliest suspects are the 84L, long action size. 270.. Not sure if theres much, if any gain over the .264, other than weight. On the other hand, I,ve probably got 250-300 rounds of .270, dies and whatnot from the last one I had, but currently 270-less. Had a nice load worked up with 150 A-Frames, pretty accurate in the last gun, should oughta almost do the job on goat shoulders. I think..??..

280 Ackley. Seems like it would be a fun new caliber, get a little more weight in the bullets. Think 160s would be a good start, not sure if 175s are likely to do well out of the 280? Also, no longer terribly opposed to muzzle brakes, so with or without a brake, think the recoil should still be fairly pleasant even in a light rifle. No prior experience with 7s of any sort, so open to suggestion.

30-06. I don,t have one. I,ve recommended, considered, and been surprised on occasion that I don,t actually have one. More frontal area.. God knows there,s ammo for it anywhere. In plenty of different weights. As far as reach, don,t know that I,m likely to be shooting at any critters any where past 300 yards, if that far, so long range ability, though nice to have, might be a non issue.. And I can,t help thinking 180s oughta be effective.. So at this point, I,ve still got a pretty light rifle, fairly short barell, and what I THINK should be plenty of bullet weight?sectional density..

300 WSM. The dark horse, at this point. Few ounces heavier, think the barrel is still 24". Don,t recall ever picking up a WSM Montana, so for those that have them, are the stock dimensions any different, thicker, or do they feel the same in the hand and balance wise as the 270/30-06 size?
Enough of a performance gain over the 30-06 to go up in gun weight and powder burned?

I reload, so not too worried about ammo, but ht ability to walk into a store and grab ammo definetly does,nt hurt.

300 Win Mag. Seems like an easy choice as far as bullet weight, reach, and ability to get brass, bullets, and such. But getting into the longer barrel again, and a scoshe over a lb heavier, if comparing the weights of the Mtn Ascent. And either more recoil, or use the muzzle brake..
And, in a Montana, not really thinking it,s going to be a long range rig, but wondering if it hits em enough harder in the 100 to 300 yards sort of range to justify the extra weight and recoil?

7 Rem Mag. Seems pretty similar arguements for and against as the 300 Win Mag, but maybe a little better balance of recoil and reach?

338-06. Would require a rebore or rebarrel, any 84L Montana should be a good start.. Good bullet selection, looks like 180s would have the same velocity, maybe better than out of the 06, more frontal area, and the ability to sling 210s at a pretty good clip. Which has a certain appeal!!
Should be brass aplenty, weight still ain,t much over 6 1/2 lbs scoped, and I think it should be a good all rounder for Alaska... Lighter rifle I believe than a 325 WSM, better bullet selection, don,t see too many down sides to this one. Has oddball appeal in its favor as well!

9.3x62. This one seems unlikely, but I,ve got plenty of brass and bullets, and a couple rifles, so I thought I might just as well toss it out there..

Looking for suggestions, thoughts, comments, etc.

Thanks in advance and I apologize for the long winded post!!
 

duchntr

WKR
Joined
Mar 31, 2013
Messages
761
Location
Anchorage,Ak
Thats a pretty wide range of calibers your looking into. I guess since you already have a bob that can easily handle all light to medium sized game (reasonably) so id lean towards buying a larger caliber rifle, preferably one you would be comfortable chasing everything with up to brownies, i think your last 4 choices is what id be narrowing in on and maybe the '06. FWIW i think my next rifle is gunna be the '06 montana.
 
Joined
Jun 15, 2015
Messages
369
Location
Washington
I just went through somewhat similar internal struggle, although I don't reload so that really kept my choices somewhat limited.
I REALLY pondered the 280 AI, but the ammo availability made me hesitant..i considered the 7mm...but i dont NEED that, and I for some reason did not want to go with a 300 wsm in such a light rifle.
In the end I picked up a 30-06 in a tikka t3 superlite and put a leupold vx3 3.5-10 CDS scope on it with some talley ltw rings, and stopped overthinking what I needed vs what I thought would be cool to add to the gun safe. I know you reload, but the range of the ammo available for the 06 is pretty good. 110 grain all the way up over 200 in tons of bullet styles.
Stid2677 on here is launching a 180 grain accubond out of his 06 at over 2900 fps.
all said and done I am into the set up about 1200 bucks (picked up the vx3 on close out) and am pretty happy with my new toy.
good luck in your decision though..this is one you will lay in bed thinking about too much until you are able to actually 'pull the trigger' on a new toy.
 
Joined
Dec 29, 2013
Messages
513
Location
GA
I have not shot a mtn goat but know several people who have. I would recommend at minimum the .30-06. Better would be the .300 WSM, .300 WinMag or .338-06. They are tough critters for sure and you really really want to pound them hard and anchor them where they stand as they live in terrible country.
Getting a new rig is always fun!
 
Joined
Oct 19, 2012
Messages
1,831
Location
Western Montana
I'd take a look at the Montana Rifle company X2. They build a very fine rifle and you have a large option of caliber choices. A .280 AI would be great as would the old plain Jane .280 Remington. Tough to beat a 30-06 as well.
 

robtattoo

WKR
Joined
Mar 22, 2014
Messages
3,532
Location
Tullahoma, TN
I'm rapidly coming to the conclusion, mostly via coercion, that the correct answer in any rifle caliber debate is .30-06. That said, I don't own one (nor have I ever played one on tv...)

If you're thinking that 99% of your shooting is going to be under 300 May I offer the humble .308 for your consideration? Within 300 I don't believe there is enough of a performance loss over the ol' '06, nor many other .30 caliber offering. It's a few ounces lighter & I'm sure would anchor a Billy.
 

elkguide

WKR
Joined
Jan 26, 2016
Messages
4,794
Location
Vermont
Owning a "few" rifles and in many of the .30 caliber offerings, I would say that is the direction that you should go. I have a Kimber Montana in .300 WSM (and yes it weighs 6 pounds 2 ounces vs. the 7mm08 Kimber Montana I have, that weighs 5 pounds 5 ounces) and love the way it shoots and handles. Yes there is recoil with it but I don't think that it is any worse than that of most '06's that I have shot. I have shunned the '06 because I always felt that if I was going to get kicked like that then I might as well get more performance for the recoil and have always gone to .300's. There are lots of option in calibers in my safes but when push comes to shove it seems like I always grab a .300 when I head out the door hunting.
 
Joined
Apr 22, 2012
Messages
7,553
Location
Chugiak, Alaska
I am a 30 caliber fan and have a .300wsm Montana that's taken brown bear (I wouldn't necessarily recommend it for this though), moose, goat, sheep, and Sitka Blacktail. I truly love this gun and caliber. I was always opposed to breaks up until last year when I decided to put one on this rifle so my 12-year-old son could use it on his goat hunt. Now, I think I may be sold on muzzle breaks. The groups I was getting with this rifle, prior to the break, were right around moa. Now, after the break, they're sub moa and the recoil is like a 9 lb. 30-06.

I recently got the itch for another Kimber and specifically a .280AI. I don't own any 7's and this caliber has always intrigued me, so I just purchased a .280 Montana and can't wait to get my hands on it and, hopefully, use it on some goats this fall.

Personally, I wouldn't spend the extra $ on the Mountain Ascent (unless of course you can get a smokin' deal on one), you can pretty easily get a Montana down to close the same wt. for just a little $. Not to mention the fact that you don't have to look at that crappy ass camo pattern all the time.
 

Mtaylor

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
Oct 6, 2014
Messages
209
If it were me 338-06, or 06. Your species of game is hinting toward a hard hitting rifle. I have a 7 mag and love it, but probably not the optimum cartridge for what you listed. Even a 300 mag or wsm would be great, looks like you are doing your research. But doesn't a 338-06 sound awesome? :)


MT
 

GKPrice

Banned
Joined
Sep 27, 2014
Messages
2,442
Location
Western Oregon
If it were me 338-06, or 06. Your species of game is hinting toward a hard hitting rifle. I have a 7 mag and love it, but probably not the optimum cartridge for what you listed. Even a 300 mag or wsm would be great, looks like you are doing your research. But doesn't a 338-06 sound awesome? :)


MT

I think the 338-06 is the absolute final word for an ALASKA rifle and pretty darn close in elk country for anything out to 400 and maybe a bit further - as others have said, "there's just something about what happens when a 338 bullets hits it's mark" - Even though I'm an " '06 kind of guy" I want a lightweight 338-06 and I want it BAD (thanks Luke ...)
 

micus

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
Feb 27, 2016
Messages
237
300 wsm, with 180's you get 200fps faster for less than 10grns of powder more than an 06. if you stick with a 180gr projectile you are getting 300wm performance with the recoil and powder burned of the 06.

I own an 06 and have shot a few rifles in the 300wsm, If I were to choose again id go WSM, 180 projectile performance is boss with this caliber.
 

Sodbuster

WKR
Joined
Jan 9, 2016
Messages
726
Location
Missouri
Another vote for the 30 caliber.The variety of bullet wieghts covers the spread from top to bottom.
I have a Kimber in 300 WSM and with my 180 grain hand loads would not be afraid of shooting anything in Alaska.NOT that I would go looking for trouble.I also have a 375 Talkeetna for the biggest and baddest.
My second pick would be the 06.Reloaders can put the turbo boost to this round fairly easily and factory ammo is everywhere.
A friend of mine killed his Brown Bear with a 30-06 and Barnes Bullet loads I cooked up for him.
Congrats on your upcoming marriage and good luck on your Goat hunt.
 

wyodan

WKR
Joined
Jan 11, 2013
Messages
741
I think the 338-06 is the absolute final word for an ALASKA rifle and pretty darn close in elk country for anything out to 400 and maybe a bit further - as others have said, "there's just something about what happens when a 338 bullets hits it's mark" - Even though I'm an " '06 kind of guy" I want a lightweight 338-06 and I want it BAD (thanks Luke ...)

Ha! Me too. This is one of the cartridges I'm considering for my next rifle.
 
Joined
Sep 9, 2012
Messages
2,074
Location
BC
For goats, just load up good bullets (TSX, TTSX, GMX or Partitions, etc) in your .257 and go hunt them. I've shot a couple with my bow and arrow although they are tough, but they aren't huge.

I do understand the want for a variety of rifles although I'm a bowhunter......I'd use my .338 Federal Kimber MT if I wanted to shoot one with a rifle. Light, compact and powerful, about like an '06 (at least to reasonable yardages) with >3,000 Ft-lbs of energy at the muzzle.
 

30338

WKR
Joined
Jun 2, 2013
Messages
1,985
Shot my goat with a rapidly expanding Berger bullet and dropped it in its tracks. Son dropped his at 450 or so yards with a balllstic tip while it was taking a nap. It never woke up. I'd day anything 25-06 or bigger with the fastest opening bullet you can shoot well. That seems to be working well on a variety of critters though. These days I think fewer rifles and a lifetime of components for each one is a better way to go.
 
OP
M

Muttly

WKR
Joined
Apr 30, 2014
Messages
578
Location
Ketchikan, AK
Allergies are kickin my ass this spring, great outdoors ain,t quite as much fun as I,d like em to be.. On the positive side, hiding out indoors, got to hefting some of the rifles around. Weight wise, that little Montana sure feels nice. CZ with a B&C in 9.3 by comparison sure feels heavy and chunky by comparison. 1/4 ounce shy of nine lbs, don,t have much desire to carry that much weight up a mountain. 264 Win Mag, even on a diet, might get down to 8 lbs.. Just hefting rifles, pondering weights, pretty much came to the conclusion that the 300 Win Mag, though having plenty going for it, is out of the equation. One lb, two ounces not a whole lot, but getting a little further away from the nice, light little rifle that made me get a Montana in the first place. Which knocks out the 7mm as well, same weight..

280 still has a definite ring to it, still not sure that that there is enough of a step from the 270 to go that way. New,cool, and neat, haven,t ruled it out, not quite sold on it...

So far, near as I can tell, 30-06 and 300 WSM are looking better and better. -06, extra round down, which with a desire to take a couple insurance shots could be advantageous..should be slicker feeding if somebody gets over excited..plenty of brass to be found, usually..should be good out to 300 yards..

300 WSM, little more powder, little more speed, maybe hit critters a little harder.. Either one, not planning on trying to turn it into a long range rig, so bullets up to 180 should be plenty. Short Mag, 7 ounces heavier, not a deal breaker. Might even make it a little steadier in the hand.

Kinda funny, started doing a little plotting a scheming, initially the 280 AI looked like the most probable way to go. Closer I look at the 30-06, the better it looks. 300 Short bears further investigation... Karumba!!...
 
Joined
Apr 22, 2012
Messages
7,553
Location
Chugiak, Alaska
Iput my .300wsm Montana on a little bit of a diet and here's where I'm at, minus scope and rings/bases.
e7d55ab0508bba9857c7ccdac32a9b84.jpg
 
Joined
Jun 15, 2015
Messages
369
Location
Washington
So far, near as I can tell, 30-06 and 300 WSM are looking better and better. -06, extra round down, which with a desire to take a couple insurance shots could be advantageous..should be slicker feeding if somebody gets over excited..plenty of brass to be found, usually..should be good out to 300 yards..
300 WSM, little more powder, little more speed, maybe hit critters a little harder.. Either one, not planning on trying to turn it into a long range rig, so bullets up to 180 should be plenty. Short Mag, 7 ounces heavier, not a deal breaker. Might even make it a little steadier in the hand.

Kinda funny, started doing a little plotting a scheming, initially the 280 AI looked like the most probable way to go. Closer I look at the 30-06, the better it looks. 300 Short bears further investigation... Karumba!!...
looking at the ballistics of factory nosler accubond loads for the 06...the 165's are good on Elk out to over 400 yards, and the 180's over 500 yards.
I would say that it would be just fine past 300 on goats if you do your job in putting it in the right spot.
 
Joined
Apr 2, 2016
Messages
34
I was in the same boat earlier this year.
I hunted goat last fall with a 10lb 7RM. It killed the goat, but he took 1 168 burger in the numbers and 2 more in the shoulder. That sucker still ran over the knob he was on! Not too far, like maybe 50yds total. But if I had it to do all over again I would use a 300wm.
I'm in the middle of putting together a tikka t-3 superlite right now. Sure it does kick, but I can handle it.
 
Top