Montana reducing nonresident deer tags

[HunterGatherer]

As a NR to the state, Im all for better management of the rescource. Just found the next paragraph in the article funny. The comish voted to pass changing the number of deer tags a R can hold from 8 to 3. Whoof, cleary the NR were the sole reason for MD decline.

2500 NR tags won’t affect the herds one bit. The anti-NR rhetoric is so pervasive in the hunting community. If only people would do a little research they would realize that NRs are putting in way more $ to the wildlife management agencies than the resident hunters in every western state. Not to mention all the other $ they bring to the local businesses where they hunt and fish. The whole system falls apart without NR hunters.

Yes, NR hunters need to be limited for the simple fact that if there weren’t limits the woods would be so full of hunters it would ruin everything. But every time they cut NR tags you should look at it as a loss of revenue more than an increase in herd numbers.

 

[mt terry d]

Huh?

What i'm saying is that the appointed leadership (by the governor) seemingly intentionally sabotages ideas that would yield good data so they can justify just doing what has always been done.

Sorry. Sarcasm is my Native tongue.

 

[Ralphie]

In general...there is zero reason to shoot a MD doe ever. Might as well shoot your neighbors mule as it eats from your hand. There are enough WT does to kill what you need.

Same for young bucks. There are plenty of species that are doing just fine if someone needs to shoot females and young.

 

[willfrye027]

Same for young bucks. There are plenty of species that are doing just fine if someone needs to shoot females and young.

Young bucks are another mouth to feed and are replenished quickly..

 

[Ralphie]

And yet in many places there are low buck numbers.

Also I’m not knocking shooting females of all species. I happily cow elk hunt every year.

 

[HuntHarder]

Sooo..., does this mean I'm not getting my annual, poverty MD montana tag in 2026? Last couple years, we haven't seen a buck that would top 160" on huntable land. I do enjoy the hunt tho.

 

[DuckDawg22]

I should have titled this Montana Reduces deer tags for Residents and non residents. I have no proof but I suspect the number of residents shooting more than three deer a year is small. Data on that would be interesting.

What I'm really concerned about is weather or not this will result in a positive result in herd health. Will there be a corresponding push for more aggressive predator management? will this just be the new norm? What we've all seen in other states is a death by a thousand cuts. Lost opportunity never comes back.

We did get a third pintail here in California this season, first time Ive heard of a limit increasing due to population health.