Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The key is process markers cannot be used as a replacement for good results. Results always win, process markers are just a guide in getting to results. Sub 1.5 MOA is all I need (from a large sample). For either of those, I would consider other factors as well in load selection (bullet, pressure, Etc). Well, I hope I would, sometimes number just make me happy.I think that can be cartridge and component dependent. But I'd take a load that repeatedly does .6" for 10 shots with an ES of 75 over a 1.5" load with an ES of 15.

As the saying goes with any precision endeavor “the last 5-10% is going to require as much or more effort that the first 90-95%”…or something along those lines.How much time and money does it take to go from a 1 MOA group to a 1/2 MOA group?
Not from 16 to 8, or 8 to 4, or 4 to 2, or 2 to 1. Those are all easily done with modern methods and equipment. But once you are at or close to 1 MOA, the time and money needed to halve it again goes up immensely. And the benefits become essentially irrelevant on animals with 8” vitals below 500 yards.
Telling a hunter to buy a $500-1000 match barrel instead of $500-1000 worth of practice ammunition is just pointless once he’s shooting 1” to 1.5” groups from a bench. At that point, his maximum range is whatever distance he can hit 10/10 inside that 8” circle from a given position and under field conditions. For some folks, the maximum range offhand is 50 yards or maximum range with any wind is 200 yards. Or whatever. And getting a match barrel or “better ammo” won’t increase the maximum range offhand or in the wind any appreciable amount.
I understand the temptation. It’s fun to shoot tiny little groups on paper. It builds confidence in ourselves and our equipment. But in non-static hunting situations, that ability and that confidence is hollow.
As the saying goes with any precision endeavor “the last 5-10% is going to require as much or more effort that the first 90-95%”…or something along those lines.
So to translate your basketball analogy to terms that address my shooting; if i have my1” (12 shot) groups, rather than be 3,4 or even 5% better from a bench, i should go out and build my field fundamentals up to the 90-95% level as a better investment. This makes sense. And someday when i need another hobby, i can lool into reloading and chasing that last 5% from a bench.