Missouri Non Res Changes

If states really cared about crowding they’d focus on EXPANDING public land territory. However that’s too difficult, it’s always easier for govt to sit back and add more limitations.

Remember, once you cheer on limiting people for “quality” the moto is set, and next it’ll be the residents who are getting restricted.

I just find it comical at times that you can still get basically an OTC sheep tag in Montana yet other places are limiting turkey/deer hunting.

This “quality hunt” cheer is going to end badly at some point for all. Yea those who “draw” may have a “quality” hunt, but how’s the “quality” for the hundreds and even thousands that don’t draw and are stuck home. Draws sound great, right up until you don’t draw.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
If states really cared about crowding they’d focus on EXPANDING public land territory. However that’s too difficult, it’s always easier for govt to sit back and add more limitations.

Remember, once you cheer on limiting people for “quality” the moto is set, and next it’ll be the residents who are getting restricted.

I just find it comical at times that you can still get basically an OTC sheep tag in Montana yet other places are limiting turkey/deer hunting.

This “quality hunt” cheer is going to end badly at some point for all. Yea those who “draw” may have a “quality” hunt, but how’s the “quality” for the hundreds and even thousands that don’t draw and are stuck home. Draws sound great, right up until you don’t draw.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yeah, I have probably seen 200+ "Not Selected" in WA and CO alone.
 
Back
Top