Berger024
WKR
I've read a couple of threads regarding this issue. I was/am using my original Traditions Brass Powder Measurer, a TC U-View Clear plastic Volume Powder Measurer and just bought a Frankford Arsenal Digital Scale. Measuring out 100grains of BH209 on the digital scale it's putting me close to 120-130 grains of volume on the Traditions Brass Powder Measurer. Are these inconsistencies due to the size and hollow cylindrical powder shape of the BH209? I've been loading BH209 by volume and after weighing I must have been shooting an undercharged load around 70-80 grains the past 7 years. Once I measured with the digital scale, the three shots I took had a noticeably larger kick like shooting a 3" shotgun sabot load.
Has anyone else seen a large difference between volume marking BH209 powder tubes, Volume Powder Measures between different companies and then going to a scale? Once I get home tonight I'm going to compare the Traditions Brass and the TC Clear plastic volume measurers. The difference between volume and weight of BH209 was pretty significant. Everything I've read online points to 100-105gr of BH209 for my setup.
I'm shooting a .50 cal Knight Ultralite with Barnes Spit-Fire Expander MZ 285grainers.
Has anyone else seen a large difference between volume marking BH209 powder tubes, Volume Powder Measures between different companies and then going to a scale? Once I get home tonight I'm going to compare the Traditions Brass and the TC Clear plastic volume measurers. The difference between volume and weight of BH209 was pretty significant. Everything I've read online points to 100-105gr of BH209 for my setup.
I'm shooting a .50 cal Knight Ultralite with Barnes Spit-Fire Expander MZ 285grainers.
Last edited: