Lrhs 3-12 vs rs1.2

[Hondo64d]

I wish it were shorter, but be that as it may, the LRHS2 is a heck of a good scope. I’ve had the 3-12 LRHS and the 3-12 LRTSi and wish I had them both back. Haven’t tried an RS1.2 yet.

John

 

[WestMOhunter]

I generally run scopes in the $400-1200 range, and bought a Trijicon Tenmile 3-18. I loved everything about the Tenmile but the reticle. When I hit 48 and had to go to readers it really affected my ability to focus the level, reticle and target together. I just couldn’t make the Trijicon work for that reason. Why bring this up? Because I bought the Maven RS1.2 (MIL) to replace it and it’s simply outstanding as a do-all scope out to 700 (all I have), while being an excellent hunting reticle. I’ve shot a buddy’s LRHSs some and like them. But IMO, the Maven reticle is much better for my eyes. It’s as close to the perfect scope as I’ve found.

 

[Walker6]

The LRHS2 is really long. That sort of turned me off, so mine is still in the box. But, it will wind up on something one of these days.

L to R: 3-9 SWFA, 3-12 LRHS, 4.5-18 LRHS2

View attachment 858984

Thanks for posting that photo