Lowa Boot experience

Joined
Jul 15, 2017
Messages
416
Location
Parker, Colorado
"Better" i guess is a relative term. I simply need it to be good for side hilling and ankle support, waterproof, and good on steep and ruggid terrain. And hopefully good for carrying loads.
If that's the case then this would probably fit your bidding better than the camino. These are a mountaineering boot, built with a stiff shank and a locking cleat so you can really reef on the laces to tighten it on your ankle. I don't think the Camino has a locking lace cleat.
 
OP
Airborne1

Airborne1

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
Mar 13, 2018
Messages
251
I guess for the price its worth trying and if they don't seem like a good fit, i got ten days to return. Thanks for all the input!
 
OP
Airborne1

Airborne1

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
Mar 13, 2018
Messages
251
I cant find it they are insulated? Says for cold weather?
 

dec0y

FNG
Joined
Jan 16, 2017
Messages
39
Location
Oregon
I'll add another vote for the Ticam II GTX. I wanted to like the Caminos but they were a little too soft for steep packouts in my view.

I used the Tibet for a season and loved the support, but I got some heel slippage and they are also quite heavy.

So the Ticam II was the middle ground--lighter weight than the Tibet, but dramatically more supportive while on steep terrain than the Camino, and a better heel design than either. It also has the same lacing hardware as the Tibet, which is second to none (locking eyelets).
 
Last edited:

Colby

WKR
Joined
Jun 25, 2013
Messages
307
Location
Sandy Oregon
I’ve struggled with boots quite a bit in the past and so far camino is are the best thing I’ve found. For me they are a good balance of decent lightweight and support.
Lowa seems to fit my feet better than kenetrek or meindl.
They don’t feel real cozy on my feet but they’ve never given me blisters or any problems and I have put a good many miles on my pair and started out with no break in to speak of.
Mine have held up pretty good, I do wear gaiters if it’s wet at all and I really think that helps with staying warm and dry.
I’d say if you can try them on and they feel decent in the store they’d be good to go for you.
Boot fit and preference seems to be a very individual thing but in my experience the casinos are pretty darn good.
 
Joined
Feb 25, 2014
Messages
2,412
Location
Pennsylvania
I tried the cevedales and they were too narrow for my liking.

I wear lowa tibets everyday for work and most recreational stuff I do.

Om my third pair and get about 2 to 3 years out of them wearing them almost every day of the year. I work as an electrician and am either on concrete or ladders most of the day. These hold up better than any boot and offer more support than most. I have 2 more pair I got on sale from shoes.com about a year ago that are still new in box. Not looking to change boots any time soon.
 

Huntin wv

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
Dec 14, 2015
Messages
213
Location
West Virginia
I’ve worn the same pair of Lowa Tibet gtx the past four years. They have several hundred hard miles on them and are still water proof and in pretty good shape. I should be able to get another year or two out of them.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
OP
Airborne1

Airborne1

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
Mar 13, 2018
Messages
251
I am thinking the Tibet or the Camino would both serve the purpose I intend to use them for. Thanks for all of the feedback everyone.
 

CDS8034

FNG
Joined
Sep 23, 2018
Messages
58
I’m not sure of the difference on all of these models, but if you have smallish feet, midway USA has the lowa bighorn hunter G3 GTX on sale for $229. These have 200grams of insulation. That is half price if they have your size and you are interested in them. I ordered a pair a couple of days ago. Have not received them yet. At the time I ordered, they only had sizes 8-9.5 for that price.
 
OP
Airborne1

Airborne1

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
Mar 13, 2018
Messages
251
I’m not sure of the difference on all of these models, but if you have smallish feet, midway USA has the lowa bighorn hunter G3 GTX on sale for $229. These have 200grams of insulation. That is half price if they have your size and you are interested in them. I ordered a pair a couple of days ago. Have not received them yet. At the time I ordered, they only had sizes 8-9.5 for that price.
Ever used the bighorns? Or anything else have given these a try?
 
Joined
Mar 15, 2016
Messages
674
Location
Boulder, Wy.
I've worn the camino, ticam II and the Baffin LL, and the Tibet GTX
the Baffin and the Tibet are very similar,, great boots but big and heavy, do it all kind of boots very comfortable, if no wet weather i wear the Baffin LL,, super comfortable. Tibet is great in the cold and wet.
i will always have both.

i have flat wide feet, the camino did not fit great, but i also went with a 1/2 size smaller when i had them, i sold them even though i really liked them,, very comfortable but just a tad to small, i then got a Ticam II as others have stated they are a cross between the camino and Tibet sort of,, the 11 1/2 Ticam just didn't fit my foot great, i have very flat feet that are low volume as well. id like to try the Camino wide,, i think it would be a great early season, hiking general boot.

i cant find any info on how much wider the camino wide is compared to the camino.

if anyone can speak to this that would be great
 
Last edited:
Joined
Sep 23, 2016
Messages
931
If waterproofing is important I would NOT buy cevedales. I have a pair that leak like a sieve. They're also not a mountaineering boot, just a stiff hiker. I so like the lace locks and rigidity but my experience (and many others if you look around) is waterproof they are not. Mine have came apart with not a lot of use. I love lowa boots, specifically bighorns and Tibet's but the cecedale was a major disappointment
 

Usi05

WKR
Joined
Jan 7, 2019
Messages
1,465
Location
Michigan
Great info here guys. I recently purchased some Danner pronghorns to test out. Also gonna give the Irox a go.

Gotta have a sturdy waterproof boot for the fall so I am starting early!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Top