LOW will do it. Who’s in?

[sndmn11]

I think there's be more success in the sub $500 price tier.

I'd be very happy to see 2-7 or 3-9, with a factory zero stop 19-22oz, ffp/mil., potentially parallax adjustable.

My perception is that the people who would try a MemeSlide Aiming Solutions scope are the same people who are aware of SWFA and if you get too far from their pricing "just to add a zero stop" you'll miss some buyers.

If you could come at the same price, with all the same features as a 3-9 with a factory zero stop and no more than +2oz you'd likely do well.

 

[gbflyer]

I think there's be more success in the sub $500 price tier.

I'd be very happy to see 2-7 or 3-9, with a factory zero stop 19-22oz, ffp/mil., potentially parallax adjustable.

My perception is that the people who would try a MemeSlide Aiming Solutions scope are the same people who are aware of SWFA and if you get too far from their pricing "just to add a zero stop" you'll miss some buyers.

If you could come at the same price, with all the same features as a 3-9 with a factory zero stop and no more than +2oz you'd likely do well.

This is my thought as well. Hunters don’t need a 56mm 40X Hubble. Probably hard to convince most of us of that, looking around under retailers counters. One of the larger items is a reticle. SWFA 3-9 is SO close…maybe close enough to leave well enough alone. They do this after all, probably will a lot less idealism.

 

[JCMCUBIC]

I think there's be more success in the sub $500 price tier.

I'd be very happy to see 2-7 or 3-9, with a factory zero stop 19-22oz, ffp/mil., potentially parallax adjustable.

My perception is that the people who would try a MemeSlide Aiming Solutions scope are the same people who are aware of SWFA and if you get too far from their pricing "just to add a zero stop" you'll miss some buyers.

If you could come at the same price, with all the same features as a 3-9 with a factory zero stop and no more than +2oz you'd likely do well.

Yep. I'd think capping windage would be good as well. Might offset any weight added from zero stop...would think it might make production easier/cheaper, but I'm not sure on that.

 

[wind gypsy]

Funny to think of all this and then it come to "3-12 LRHS with a different reticle" (which is pretty much what I'd want). I don't love the reticle but I'm not killing/missing based on it so why exert a bunch of effort on doing something different?

 

[Castle Rock]

I agree, it isn’t hard, it has all been done before, no need to reinvent the wheel