mavinwa2
WKR
- Joined
- Sep 11, 2018
AZ following the pay more, receive less pathway.
I miss the value loss of the OTC archery tag.
Prior years could hunt muley bucks in December & January. Some units coues bucks available too.
Most units now only January or part of January for mulies. For residents and non-residents the changes represent lost opportunities & time in the field. Surely now more immature bucks will fall to the arrow.
Less time to hunt, some hunters will feel more pressure to fill tag...especially if a $300 tag + $160 combo* license=$460 non-resident.
* Fishing license too required on non-resident. What a joke, not a trout stream around where I hunt AZ*.
Had to pass 2 muley 170+ bucks in 24B in December 2021.
1 of those was larger than my 2020 muley buck (see avatar). Buck was trailing a doe, the doe came within 30 yards of my position.
At least I'll be hunting there in January 2022, starting Jan-6.
Hunting 10 days, couldn't find a 24B coues buck worthy of an arrow. Passed on couple 2-points, just couldn't find a bigger coues buck. A pass decision made easier by 2 full freezers at home and borrowing 1/2 freezer at a friend's home.
After Xmas, encountered 2 hunters, each tagged a coues buck; spike and small 2x1.
One a resident, the other hunter from Texas; "for over $450, can't come home to the wife with nothin..."
My ethics are to follow the rules, regulations.
However, I have to wonder WHY any OTC archery hunter would voluntarily report a harvest success...only to potentially have less opportunity or reduced time-in-field for the future due to that successful report.
With mandatory reporting on the horizon; How much of that data will be factual, reliable & truthful?
Pretty sure a AZFG bean counter will add in a % to compensate as they do now for harvest numbers.
I miss the value loss of the OTC archery tag.
Prior years could hunt muley bucks in December & January. Some units coues bucks available too.
Most units now only January or part of January for mulies. For residents and non-residents the changes represent lost opportunities & time in the field. Surely now more immature bucks will fall to the arrow.
Less time to hunt, some hunters will feel more pressure to fill tag...especially if a $300 tag + $160 combo* license=$460 non-resident.
* Fishing license too required on non-resident. What a joke, not a trout stream around where I hunt AZ*.
Had to pass 2 muley 170+ bucks in 24B in December 2021.
1 of those was larger than my 2020 muley buck (see avatar). Buck was trailing a doe, the doe came within 30 yards of my position.
At least I'll be hunting there in January 2022, starting Jan-6.
Hunting 10 days, couldn't find a 24B coues buck worthy of an arrow. Passed on couple 2-points, just couldn't find a bigger coues buck. A pass decision made easier by 2 full freezers at home and borrowing 1/2 freezer at a friend's home.
After Xmas, encountered 2 hunters, each tagged a coues buck; spike and small 2x1.
One a resident, the other hunter from Texas; "for over $450, can't come home to the wife with nothin..."
My ethics are to follow the rules, regulations.
However, I have to wonder WHY any OTC archery hunter would voluntarily report a harvest success...only to potentially have less opportunity or reduced time-in-field for the future due to that successful report.
With mandatory reporting on the horizon; How much of that data will be factual, reliable & truthful?
Pretty sure a AZFG bean counter will add in a % to compensate as they do now for harvest numbers.
Last edited: