@Boomer93 Ive owned several inexpensive bushnell scopes from 10ish yrs ago that have been used pretty extensively and never lost zero. Still have one, still going strong. Ive also owned vortex vipers, and shoot with several people that have them, and ALL of them lose zero. Literally every single one of the examples Im familiar with requires frequent re-zeroing, including mine. So while vortex has a lot more scopes out there, just in my own experience most of the scopes I have experience with have failed. If its for a use where that is non-critical, then can be a good value. I’ll continue to use and be happy with my vortex binos, but if you care about such things I wont be buying another vortex scope. Same with the other brand that shall not be mentioned, Ive personally had multiple failures so no more for me, not when there are other good options that are more reliable.
The lower and mid range athlon scopes Ive looked thru were noticeably worse than any trijicon ive looked thru, especially the contrast, which I think helps seeing brown things in a sea of brown twigs.
I would not personally put a dialing scope on a point and shoot rifle, especially if it had a finer reticle that was harder to see in a very busy background. But if that doesnt bother you, that nxs is another option.
My short range woods gun wears a trijicon accupoint 1-6. The “glass” is easily better than my viper pst g2, and it has a great eyebox, and a great reticle for fast, brushy, busy background. If you just had to have a larger objective that S&B 1.5-6 would be my personal choice. But I have not had an issue with light gathering even in the woods. It seems some of this is individual as much as it is the terrain/cover and the scope itself. If you search here for “short range brush gun” or similar you’ll see several threads where this has been beat to death.