Again this thread has nothing to do with Alaska. Go start that thread and I'll explain to you why you're wrong there too.
The cognitive dissonance in your opening statement is astounding. There's nothing degenerative about ignoring corrupt and unjust laws that harm no one. That's about as American as it gets.
The line is a function of who's harmed or not harmed, the level of corruption, and the feasibility of other available options. In a system where you have no voice in the management of property you have a right to as a tax payer, where the state that was given their authority in good faith is openly acting corruptly, choosing defiance at the risk of defined consequences is reasonable whether you agree with it or not.