tdhanses
WKR
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2018
- Messages
- 6,106
Loggers, miners, livestock producers etc wouldn’t thrive if the land was private?Wrong again and what Americans realize is that they don't have to physically be present on every acre of federal land to benefit from it.
It's not just hunters and angler's that benefit from public lands...it's loggers, miners, livestock producers, tourism of all types, and on and on and on.
The American public will not surrender it's birthright of public lands...just a fact.
Your telling me the majority of tourist are hiking way back into these lands in mass?
Retaining 20% of public lands would cover 95% of current use as far as tourism goes.
Private ownership would make it easier to harvest lumber and minerals, plus states would get more tax rev.
Public land is government welfare.