List of Companies Still Sponsoring/Partnering with Convicted Wildlife Violators

Tim Sundles- Buffalo Bore (killed a lot of pets trying to whack wolves, Google it)

While not convicted and/or charged, Randy Newberg’s definitely weaves the line in conduct to ensure they pay the minimum bill to land management agencies. (FOIA some folks for that one.)
 
Tim Sundles- Buffalo Bore (killed a lot of pets trying to whack wolves, Google it)

While not convicted and/or charged, Randy Newberg’s definitely weaves the line in conduct to ensure they pay the minimum bill to land management agencies. (FOIA some folks for that one.)
You need to provide some evidence for what you’re saying and by your own admission it doesn’t look like you can.
 
Tim Sundles- Buffalo Bore (killed a lot of pets trying to whack wolves, Google it)

While not convicted and/or charged, Randy Newberg’s definitely weaves the line in conduct to ensure they pay the minimum bill to land management agencies. (FOIA some folks for that one.)
Newberg is an accountant first. Would you hire a cpa who tried to pay the maximum in taxes? It’d be out of character if he didn’t go for the lowest amount.
 
You need to provide some evidence for what you’re saying and by your own admission it doesn’t look like you can.
The former claim is definitely much easier to verify than the latter. And frankly, it’s two completely different things. Buffalo Bore should be avoided anyway with their business practices; but Tim Sundles is a POS.

Hindsight, I should’ve kept the second assertion to myself, as it isn’t exactly a “wildlife crime”. Newberg isn’t in violation of any part 36 CFR; and I never said he is. Just some convenient “use” definitions and inconsistencies. Although there is one TV network that is much, much worse.

Pardon my derail.
 
The former claim is definitely much easier to verify than the latter. And frankly, it’s two completely different things. Buffalo Bore should be avoided anyway with their business practices; but Tim Sundles is a POS.

Hindsight, I should’ve kept the second assertion to myself, as it isn’t exactly a “wildlife crime”. Newberg isn’t in violation of any part 36 CFR; and I never said he is. Just some convenient “use” definitions and inconsistencies. Although there is one TV network that is much, much worse.

Pardon my derail.
Randy Newberg probably does more for the future of hunting and conservation than everyone on this thread put together, I'm not even talking about being a Youtuber or a hunting social media personality.

He is probably one of if not the most involved advocates for our hunting future/public lands that I know of, I know that people have an issue with him and blowing up certain areas on T.V. but if just a handful of us put in the effort he does to advocate for our hunting future we would all be in a better situation.
 
Back
Top