My NULA 6.5 CRD is right at 5 lbs with a Swarovski 3-9x36 and shoots sub-moa. It has a 22" #1 contour barrel and 14" LOP stock.
IMHO, it is the perfect backpack/mountain rifle.
Ok, so my scale was a little off (please don't stone me).Tell me more about this rifle man!!! Sounds awesome to be right at 5 pounds with scope and rings!
My cousin just picked up an Adirondack in 7-08 and with a Zeiss scope to match and Talley rings it's right at 6lbs on the nose and shoots under half moa. Not bad for ANY RIFLE.
Ok, so my scale was a little off (please don't stone me).
Rifle is just over 6 lbs loaded.
NULA Model 20, 6.5 Creedmoor
14 inch LOP
22 inch #1 bbl
Talley rings
Swarovski Z3 3-9x36
Handloads: 140 Nosler Partition, IMR 4350, ~2650 fps
The eyebox on the Z3 is a little "tight." I ordered a Leupold VX-3i 3.5-10x40 from the custom shop to try in its place.
To me, this rifle is worth every penny. I could have bought multiple [insert quality mountain-style rifle here] for the cost of the NULA, but glad I didn't. Melvin Forbes told me that if I didn't like it, he would buy it back for a full refund . . . he can keep my money.
Set of postal scales???
Someone correct me if I am wrong in what I have been told by a couple of rifle builders. They told me if you don't shoot a ton of rounds through your rifle then the titanium actions are fine, if you do a lot of shooting then they get hot and start to lose tolerances a lot quicker than the steel actions. Any truth to this? Neither of the ones I talked to did any work on ti actions because of this. I'm guessing that the average hunter who shoots a box or two of shells through his rifle a year would ever notice, but if you like to burn powder it could be an issue. My cousin just picked up an Adirondack in 7-08 and with a Zeiss scope to match and Talley rings it's right at 6lbs on the nose and shoots under half moa. Not bad for a rifle that size.
This one came out under 5lb with a 25" barrel. Model 7 rem, .264 raptor (.264/300 saum imp.) #1 barrel, MPI ultra light stock. Now it wears a Swaro z3 dc and weighs 6lb 2oz. I'd like to build another similar one with a titanium model 7 action. Maybe 4 pounds with 24" barrel would be achievable but with the components available now I think 4 is the limit without shortening the barrel.
The adirondack is about the same weight as the mountain ascent. However maybe the bolt knob is steel, and maybe the trigger guard is steel. If so, then with some mods the Adirondack could be lighter. I tried Googling but can't figure it out.
Well it'd be for carrying around the mountains, so lightweight is important. The range wouldn't be anywhere close to 1000. It's for hunting so the Creedmoor is not effective enough for my preferences at 1000 yards. Let's say 500 yards or under. If it could shoot 1 moa that would be enough. I'm basically curious if I could make a rifle that's lighter than a Kimber Mountain Ascent (which isn't chambered in 6.5 creedmoor anyway). Brown Precision Pound'r, potentially a titanium action, Hastings Microcell recoil pad (if they still make them), some ultralight barrel, talley lightweight rings, probably Leupold VX2 3-9x33 ultralight.
If you were going to build a 6.5mm Creedmoor rifle, what is the lightest barrel you could use? Also what length barrel would you use?