JGRaider
WKR
Good post Nevada Mike, but you can't get away with that kind of language/positive experience with the RS LDS crowd here.
LDS? I'm a CDS- Current Day Saint.Good post Nevada Mike, but you can't get away with that kind of language/positive experience with the RS LDS crowd here.
DoneNeed an "I don't/haven't had a Leupold" as I have to cast a vote to see the results.
Thank you.Done
I doubt it is the load, it could be, but load development is a lot of trouble and if you don't have a know accurate load, it is very hard to verify. I've tried 5 powders, 2 primers, and 3 different bullets and with various combinations and the worst group I have gotten was 2.03 inches at 100 yards and most are closer to 1.25; well I should say load development should be easy if everything else works. Of course, if the rifle is know to be a picky eater, that changes things.I am not a competitive shooter. I just kill game and have for a lot of years. A year or so ago my go to rifle started getting wierd. I sent my leupold vx-II in for repairs. I got it back but while the verticle adjustment was 1 click equals 1/4 moa at 100 yds the horizontal adjustment was 17 clicks per 1/4 moa.
I thought that was a little off but was it me, the ammo or something else. I gave it a break and changed to a new leupold 3HD - 4.5-16 B&C . Once I got it partially zeroed in I noted that I had half inch groups and then the next group was 2-3 inches. I started to question everything. What had I changed?
Then I noted that a variable was that I had not paid attention to was CCI primers have not been available for a while so I was using Winchester.
My new loads are from a differant lot of H-4350. Now I don't know what is the critical variable. I have sorted all my lots of ammo by primer to start with.
I will shoot again when it quits snowing. Then I my have to go back and start over on my loads with the new powder lot. Then I will go back to working on my scopes.
I haven't got a definitive answer yet but I have a plan and with some heat I will work on it.
My mark 5 just got the erector system replaced for the 2nd time with minimal field use...My MK5 that gets swapped around, goes to the range in a soft bag, and gets rough treatment holds zero. And, the several other friends own have held zero. And, the competitors and professional shooters I know of makes it unlikely that the stories of MK5 regularly failing.
You can’t compare all scopes by a manufacturer.
Also, is it the scope or the rings or the base?
My experience at the range and watching scopes get mounted at Bass Pro would suggest many failures are other than the scope.