Yes Leupold as with most major manufacturers has actually machines to scientifically test impacts. Not some backwoods methods eyeballing a height with a gun that can rotate on the fall and so forth.
Is this something new?
Yes Leupold as with most major manufacturers has actually machines to scientifically test impacts. Not some backwoods methods eyeballing a height with a gun that can rotate on the fall and so forth.
Oh you’re in trouble now!!!Yes Leupold as with most major manufacturers has actually machines to scientifically test impacts. Not some backwoods methods eyeballing a height with a gun that can rotate on the fall and so forth.
Probably too far to ride his bike…No. They’re talking about “shake” machines.
Once again, I offer you the opportunity with the owner of this site present and video cameras running uninterrupted to show how “backwoods” what we’re doing is. You bad mouth and talk shit, yet are unwilling to show up and prove how stupid we are. Why?
Yes Leupold as with most major manufacturers has actually machines to scientifically test impacts. Not some backwoods methods eyeballing a height with a gun that can rotate on the fall and so forth.
No. They’re talking about “shake” machines.
Once again, I offer you the opportunity with the owner of this site present and video cameras running uninterrupted to show how “backwoods” what we’re doing is. You bad mouth and talk shit, yet are unwilling to show up and prove how stupid we are. Why?
They are referring to a “vibration table” which is a standard test methodology to test impact and vibration testing in a scientific and controlled manner. Vibration tables are standard test methodologies in both defense and commercial application.
what it does is test in a controlled and statistically valid process. That way, once a bad design is identified a fix can be implemented and verified. These processes all are based on statisticlily significant data.
simply dropping random rifles from random heights provides random data. No real engineering processes can be derived from random data.
To cut to the chase, Leuphold is simply doing this in a controlled manner
Yes Leupold as with most major manufacturers has actually machines to scientifically test impacts. Not some backwoods methods eyeballing a height with a gun that can rotate on the fall and so forth.
It’s completely non scientific and actual optic engineers have stated that any optic could fail that test.
They are referring to a “vibration table” which is a standard test methodology to test impact and vibration testing in a scientific and controlled manner. Vibration tables are standard test methodologies in both defense and commercial application.
what it does is test in a controlled and statistically valid process. That way, once a bad design is identified a fix can be implemented and verified. These processes all are based on statisticlily significant data.
simply dropping random rifles from random heights provides random data. No real engineering processes can be derived from random data.
To cut to the chase, Leuphold is simply doing this in a controlled manner
Ok but hunters don’t really shake scopes. And scopes holding up to recoil should be a given. I agree with the need for a controlled environment and statistically significant n values. All that is fine, but do that with tests that matter! Drops happen. So test for them and proof mechanics against them. It’s that simple.They are referring to a “vibration table” which is a standard test methodology to test impact and vibration testing in a scientific and controlled manner. Vibration tables are standard test methodologies in both defense and commercial application.
what it does is test in a controlled and statistically valid process. That way, once a bad design is identified a fix can be implemented and verified. These processes all are based on statisticlily significant data.
simply dropping random rifles from random heights provides random data. No real engineering processes can be derived from random data.
To cut to the chase, Leuphold is simply doing this in a controlled manner
Because optical engineers evidently don’t even know what they don’t know. Group suck.It’s completely non scientific and actual optic engineers have stated that any optic could fail that test.