I've shot 2. Neither were my rifles. I like the Kimbers and prior to getting my Fieldcraft, I was actually shopping for one. I'd compare it to an early supercar. They were a b*tch to maintain and make run right compared to the Lamborghini Gallardos and Huracans of today. But when you got one of them purring, there was nothing better.
That's why I asked, "better than what"? Not here to argue when the OP hasn't even qualified his question. Who knows what he is actually looking for.
What if it does that every time he shoots it?
I like the fieldcrafts too, I should have gotten one when they were 1600.00 dollars, not worth the asking price these days at least for me.
You’re insignificant.
I should have bought them in every flavor. Lol. I'm looking forward to Barrett bringing them back, but there's absolutely no way they will be sub $2000 guns in today's market. I'd guess they'll be around the mid 2000s
You did ask better than what. Then you listed rifles it was not better than. Then you said depends on what better means.
Cool
That’d be a platform delivering a killing bullet I could get behind.
In what way?
Multiple 3-round groups is absolutely plenty in an ultralight hunting rifle to prove it is repeatable.
That is not a correct conclusion.
It's good enough for me. But to each their own.
Shooting a 10 rd group with a pencil barrel will be statistically insignificant. The group spreads when barrel heats up after 3 rds (5 max).
It’s funny you post on the UM Tikka rings thread drop test post, but find this data statistically significant.
Who?
I'm not sure how my liking the work that Form puts into his testing relevant to this conversation, but I'm not here to argue. If the OP wants to better clarify his question, I may chime in if I can add value.
Here’s a fact…. put a target up at 100 yds and give me my ammo of choice and i’ll shoot sub MOA with first 3 rds.
