Today at 7:20 AM #21 J JGRaider WKR Joined Jul 3, 2019 Messages 1,810 Location West Texas That would actually be 16-1700fps for partition/accubond.
Today at 7:26 AM #22 N nobody WKR Joined Sep 15, 2020 Messages 1,969 JGRaider said: That would actually be 16-1700fps for partition/accubond. Click to expand... I thought that figure was for the Accubond long Range and the standard Accubond was roughly 400 FPS different? EDIT: Just checked the google machine, you’re right. I stand corrected!
JGRaider said: That would actually be 16-1700fps for partition/accubond. Click to expand... I thought that figure was for the Accubond long Range and the standard Accubond was roughly 400 FPS different? EDIT: Just checked the google machine, you’re right. I stand corrected!
Today at 7:57 AM #23 TheViking WKR Joined Mar 2, 2019 Messages 1,659 Location Colorado My 6.5 PRC shoots the new Federal Fusion Tipped 140 grainers at 3035 FPS (20 shot average) chronoed with my Garmin. 7RM's shoot 140's arond 3100-3150. Are you honestly going to think that an elk won't die with 75-100 fps less in the same bullet weight? This conversation in lunacy.
My 6.5 PRC shoots the new Federal Fusion Tipped 140 grainers at 3035 FPS (20 shot average) chronoed with my Garmin. 7RM's shoot 140's arond 3100-3150. Are you honestly going to think that an elk won't die with 75-100 fps less in the same bullet weight? This conversation in lunacy.