Where do you see this? Do you hang out at big box stores during hunting season and look at license plates and check mom and pop shops and do a calculation? When did you see this or hear it? Did you read a report from U of M's BBER on economic trends? Or maybe, just maybe, are you using your bias to blather on an internet forum where being wrong doesn't cost you anything? What are your sources?
This isn't even an economics issue, other than communist economics when friends of politicians get special treatment and guaranteed business.
Where did this happen in Montana? What public land sold to whom? I honestly would like to know if that's happened in the last 15 years. "Keeps" means they are continuing to do it. Help a guy out.
I get bummed when a public land place I've hunted for a long time and had to myself suddenly has out of state plates and hunters on it, but I'm honestly happy for someone who drove out here and is having the time of their life chasing critters, can't blame anyone.
I used to be anti outfitter. In some ways I still am. I also have a different perspective now, since I went and worked for one to see for myself what's up. In those travels I've run across both spectrums. All in all though outfitters work very hard and don't have as much money in the bank as one would think or as it appears to the eye. For most its a way of life. Their money goes to the business, constantly caring for stock, equipment family. Some of the hardest working down to earth folks I've ran across.
Yes I've ran across the other end of that also.
Same exact thing can be said for diy guys. I've always been a diy guy. I'm constantly hunting out of state myself.
I've been out of state hunting and ran across "locals" thatve tried running me out of places my family has hunted since 70's. Also ran across guys that have become hunting buddies. I hunt there, they come here, we go do whatever.
So all my "blathering" is from personal experience.
I probably have more issue with "locals" here in montana then I do with NR. I see more locals that show their buts then NR.
I agree whole heartedly that 60 percent is too much. I also agree that proper licensed outfitters should have some guaranteed tags. What the fair number is, well idk that.
The ones I worked for are booked a couple years in advance. However, if hunters don't draw then it a scramble, moving clients around, moving money, plus all the book work they have to keep and change for the forest service and fish and game.
So when I hear the phrase outfitter welfare, it gets my hackels up. Be the same as if I were to talk about how useless and lazy your sister is....disclaimer im not doing that, purely example.
They dang sure know in advance how tough it is. Some make it some dont. At the end of the day, they are providing a service. Helping people get to go do things in places their dreams can't conjure. Have once in a lifetime experiences. Thats the stuff that makes all this other B.S. tolerable. They are serving others instead of themselves. The profit margins aren't what you think in most cases.