I wanna buy the Credo HX 2.5-15 but..

gsully

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
Aug 5, 2019
Messages
145
Is there a zero stop on the Credo? That might be a selling point.

I'm just now getting into FFP/Maven Rs1.2 and a little nervous about FFP and quick short range shots as well. But so far, like many are saying, it's just a duplex at short range. Point and shoot.

I kind of think of the FFP as getting multiple scopes in one; a duplex reticle for short range, hold over capable always correct sub tensions at mid range, and an advanced reticle at long range.
 
Joined
Jan 26, 2017
Messages
3,400
Location
PA
Swfa 3-9 is the right choice. If you're in se pa I have a couple swfas you could look through, the mil quad is a great reticle for hunting AND because it's ffp you can hold for wind at any magnification. And that's what holds are for: wind. Dial elevation, gravity is real stable.
 

barrister

WKR
Joined
Feb 7, 2017
Messages
393
Location
Ohio
It's not on your list, but I really like the Trijicon Accupoint 4-16X50. I was originally considering the Credo but all of the reticles looked too busy for my personal taste. I also had concerns about feedback on the thin reticle. My purchase was for hunting purposes and my comfortable shooting range is 600 yards or less. I have two more being shipped right now for a couple current rifle projects.
 
Joined
Dec 10, 2017
Messages
1,495
Location
Pullman, WA
Is there a zero stop on the Credo? That might be a selling point.

I'm just now getting into FFP/Maven Rs1.2 and a little nervous about FFP and quick short range shots as well. But so far, like many are saying, it's just a duplex at short range. Point and shoot.

I kind of think of the FFP as getting multiple scopes in one; a duplex reticle for short range, hold over capable always correct sub tensions at mid range, and an advanced reticle at long range.
Yes there is a zero stop on the Credo.
 
OP
H

Huntsalot

FNG
Joined
Mar 4, 2017
Messages
96
Swfa 3-9 is the right choice. If you're in se pa I have a couple swfas you could look through, the mil quad is a great reticle for hunting AND because it's ffp you can hold for wind at any magnification. And that's what holds are for: wind. Dial elevation, gravity is real stable.

Thanks for the offer. For me 9x is good for about 150yds! I have 3 of the 2.5-10 swfa's but they're all on 100yd deer guns. I prefer SFP and dialing over holdovers.
 
OP
H

Huntsalot

FNG
Joined
Mar 4, 2017
Messages
96
It's not on your list, but I really like the Trijicon Accupoint 4-16X50. I was originally considering the Credo but all of the reticles looked too busy for my personal taste. I also had concerns about feedback on the thin reticle. My purchase was for hunting purposes and my comfortable shooting range is 600 yards or less. I have two more being shipped right now for a couple current rifle projects.

I saw that option, looks nice. I don't believe it's been verified by the torture test though. That knocks it out for me. My Credo should be here on Tuesday!
 
Joined
Jan 26, 2017
Messages
3,400
Location
PA
Thanks for the offer. For me 9x is good for about 150yds! I have 3 of the 2.5-10 swfa's but they're all on 100yd deer guns. I prefer SFP and dialing over holdovers.

What? My 8 year old killed a button buck at 300 this year, scope was on 4x. We have shot steel to 400, with the scope on 4x. Ffp scopes can dial for Elevation, just like I said in my first post. Holding over for elevation as a main strategy is dumb.

Sfp scopes cannot conveniently compensate for wind at anything other than max magnification. Ffp scopes can. That's the differentiator, and its a big one.
 
OP
H

Huntsalot

FNG
Joined
Mar 4, 2017
Messages
96
What? My 8 year old killed a button buck at 300 this year, scope was on 4x. We have shot steel to 400, with the scope on 4x. Ffp scopes can dial for Elevation, just like I said in my first post. Holding over for elevation as a main strategy is dumb.

Sfp scopes cannot conveniently compensate for wind at anything other than max magnification. Ffp scopes can. That's the differentiator, and its a big one.

What's the confusion? I appreciate the recommendation but we have different opinions. I have zero desire to own a 9x scope on a several hundred yard gun. I've only ever used SFP and I've never compensated for wind. At the ranges I shoot, it's never been necessary. The Maven and SWFA I was considering were solely for the reliability. I was never going to use the FFP for holdovers or wind.
 
Top