Steve300xcw
WKR
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2017
- Messages
- 3,113
I thought hunters ed stuff was just for the under 18 people?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If born after 1/1/1949, you are required to have your hunter's ed card on you while hunting in CO. The exception being if the card is "verified", which I believe entails some extra steps with CPW.I thought hunters ed stuff was just for the under 18 people?
Interesting story: as a kid we had a cabin in northern Wisconsin with a lot of state land around us and also a lot of private. Me and my friends used to free range a lot which often included hunting on both. Private landowners back then ( late 70’s early 80’s) were not nearly so uptight as they are now. Anyway I was hunting alone for squirrels, rabbits and grouse and I came out on a county road at the same time a forest ranger was patrolling for illegal Xmas tree cutting. He stopped me and questioned me ( 12 or 13 year old). I didn’t happen to have my firearms safety cert with me so he “ escorted “ me back to our cabin to verify it. Just so happened that my dad had a few tips ups placed out on the lake fishing for northern and walleye that were unattended while he went out for a snowmobile cruise. Long story short, the now involved conservation officer had a great interest in that and not so much in me. My takeaway was it was a petty move by the forest ranger to give a damn about a teenage boy out in the woods hunting. But that lead to a bust for my dad who was technically breaking the law. Draw your own conclusions. I hold no animosity toward either them nor current conservation and forest people. They have tough jobs protecting our natural resources. Own your culpability in breaking rules or laws.
Not sure how you can view this as anything other than a bad interaction- he followed you onto your private property and cited you for inoperable machinery? Just because he walked back after the fact doesn't make it a good interaction
I don't think citing someone for an inoperable machine that is clearly stored would even count as a technical violation. They are inoperable. I would question how he would explain that in court; comes across more as attempting to cover his own rear end after the fact so he doesn't have to explain himself to the judgeI think otherwise. The warden gets back to the truck, reevaluates the interaction and decides that while there was a technical violation he should let empathy drive his decision. Few, very few, people are willing to admit they made a mistake or didn't make the best decision. It's rarer yet in the law enforcement community.
See what I mean about people's willingness to admit they didn't get it right?I don't think citing someone for an inoperable machine that is clearly stored would even count as a technical violation. They are inoperable. I would question how he would explain that in court; comes across more as attempting to cover his own rear end after the fact so he doesn't have to explain himself to the judge
You’ll have that on these bigger jobs!You guys don’t see your local game warden weekly? I’m on a first name basis with mine and I’ve never had a ticket or infraction.
Only bad interaction I’ve had with one was a few years ago. Working on a water project in town we accidentally cut a water line that wasn’t marked correctly. Belonged to one of the local wardens. They had just gotten home and got in the shower. That one was awkward.
Can't screw up if you only answer the question once.You'll be asked the same questions multiple times. Just be honest with your answers and it'll be fine. You can't screw up if you're honest during the interview.
So he realized he was in the wrong?I think otherwise. The warden gets back to the truck, reevaluates the interaction and decides that while there was a technical violation he should let empathy drive his decision. Few, very few, people are willing to admit they made a mistake or didn't make the best decision. It's rarer yet in the law enforcement community.
No, it doesn't mean that he was wrong. I am sure you are a smart person. Figure it out.So he realized he was in the wrong?
Sounds like a bad interaction.
Even if cops rarely realize they can be wrong.
I worked a summer as a sticker checker. Most folks had their stickers on their machines, but the few who didn't had them on their person. If they didn't have a sticker we'd just tell them the closest place to go get one then swing back through a few days later to double check. Never had anyone fail to get a sticker.Many years ago we broke down and bought an ATV. Had no idea you had to have an OHV sticker for it, we thought our state registration was all that was needed. Another hunter had stopped to talk at our camp, he told us we had to have the sticker. No big deal we drove an hour into town the next day on Friday because our hunt didn't start until Saturday. We got to the National Forest office in the little town after an hour drive. The ranger there was sorry but he was all out of the forms and said we would have to drive to another town with a main office and it was another hour away. Well we drove all the way there and got our paperwork but the sticker would have to be mailed. Later that week we were stopped by a NF ranger along with the game state warden who were riding together on ATVs. We could not find the paperwork anywhere. It happened to be the NF ranger from the small town who didn't have the right form. After a long bit of looking for the paperwork he said he recognized us and didn't care if we had it or not because we had come in and tried, I really wanted to show him the paperwork but never found it to this day. When we got home there was the sticker in the mail. I'm sure he didn't believe our story but it was true
Libtard Colorado says you have to have it if you’re younger than 75.I thought hunters ed stuff was just for the under 18 people?
Oh, the folks who think(or wish) all encounters are so rosy and professional.Give respect, get respect.